63
submitted 4 months ago by ZenkorSoraz@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Liz@midwest.social 10 points 4 months ago

More like lots of having to refute dumb arguments that imply choosing harm reduction is the same thing as endorsing harm.

[-] doubtingtammy@lemmy.ml 11 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

"harm reduction" in the context of genocide is absolutely wild. It's a genocide, not a heroin habit

[-] Liz@midwest.social 3 points 4 months ago

I want no genocide. My choices are: vote for a candidate that would make the genocide worse, while complaining they're supporting a genocide, or vote for a candidate that would more or less do nothing about it, while complaining they're ineffectual at stopping the genocide.

How can you not see one of those two options is better?

[-] doubtingtammy@lemmy.ml 7 points 4 months ago

Biden isnt "doing nothing", he's actively making it worse. He is directly complicit. How do you not see this?

[-] Liz@midwest.social 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Okay, does that actually change the choice you make? You only have two practical options when it comes to voting. I said do nothing because the government's policy on Israel effectively hasn't changed now that they've started a genocide (or rather, really ramped up their genocide). In that sense, he's doing nothing. But again, does that change the choice you make in order to end up with the world closest to what you want?

[-] whoreticulture 1 points 4 months ago

The third choice is to refuse to vote for genocide supporters and force the obstensibly liberal party to change their actions. Genocide funders don't get free votes just for having the D next to their name.

[-] Liz@midwest.social 1 points 4 months ago

You seem to think I'm voting for them without making it known their Israel policy is unacceptable. You seem to think that Biden won't listen to public opinion at all. You seem to think that if I withhold my vote for Biden, there is no potential consequence for doing so, like, I dunno, Trump winning a second term, making the genocide even worse, and attempting to make himself a proper dictator.

[-] whoreticulture 1 points 4 months ago

Or the potential consequence of the Democratic party realizing they actually have to make an effort to get votes.

[-] Zeroxxx@lemmy.id 1 points 4 months ago

That genocide supporter oughta Genocide Biden and the other do nothing one oughta Peaceful Trump I see.

[-] Woozythebear@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

Found the genocide supporter

this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2024
63 points (100.0% liked)

Asklemmy

43385 readers
1102 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS