I’m not the OP, but I don’t feel like it would affect the process of harvesting your data or put some burden on the company doing it, since they have big bucks.

Maybe. For me its a combination of very easy to add the license, hoping fellow coders who create the models will honor a Creative Commons license, and figuring that at some point in the future Congress will get around to passing laws about who owns content, how its labled, and how others can scrape such data. There's already arguments going on between big corporations about paying to use the content to build the models, so I'm assuming that lobbying is being done right now in that category.

Though honestly I might just get bored some day and talk to my lawyer friend about what I would need to do to test this all out. Boredom is something you have at times, when retired.

But at the same time I’m not against it for it can lead to many humorous examples of AI putting this license after it’s replies after learning on your content. It would be the platinum tier absurdity and I’m all for it.

lol! I never heard of this, that's really funny actually.

Now that you mention it, in theory, we could all "black box" input into the models by having wacky stuff in our comments.

~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~

Unless the site has has an overriding license, it does indeed put burden on the AI trainers to exclude it.

However, will they do so unless legally forced to do so? Probably not. And they probably will treat it on a case-by-case basis.