173

submitted 6 months ago by AnActOfCreation@programming.dev to c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

53 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] randomaside@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 6 months ago

Is there an alternative way to register a domain that cannot be seized? It seems like domain seizure is the one thing that enables internet censorship. Is there some sort of block chain base registrars out there? I'm genuinely curious.

[-] reddithalation@sopuli.xyz 11 points 6 months ago

I think one way is to use a domain host that is located in some country that doesn't care at all.

[-] hedgehog@ttrpg.network 10 points 6 months ago

Is there some sort of block chain base registrars out there?

There are handshake domains, which are distributed on a blockchain, but sites that use them won’t resolve in browsers by default

[-] vox@sopuli.xyz 8 points 6 months ago

just don't use one?
host shit on bare ips

[-] matey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 6 months ago

You can't have valid HTTPS on bare IPs.

[-] vox@sopuli.xyz 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

yah i forgor about that
but technically you can, but with a self signed certificate only (ehich are less secure; or by asking people to set up the dns manually)
with self signed certs you don't lose encryption, but the client won't be able to make sure that it's connecting to your server specifically

[-] bitfucker@programming.dev 1 points 6 months ago

Technically they could by manually verifying the cert from somewhere offline.

[-] hacktheegg@programming.dev 1 points 6 months ago

From what I know, the for network fits this

They need to have access to the private key to seize (and even then, the site can be taken back to warn others)
Lack of centralised link buying service

(My knowledge comes from this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Ua8HrgZsAg)