821
Aesthetics rule
(pawb.social)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2024
821 points (100.0% liked)
196
17533 readers
313 users here now
Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.
Rule: You must post before you leave.
Other rules
Behavior rules:
- No bigotry (transphobia, racism, etc…)
- No genocide denial
- No support for authoritarian behaviour (incl. Tankies)
- No namecalling
- Accounts from lemmygrad.ml, threads.net, or hexbear.net are held to higher standards
- Other things seen as cleary bad
Posting rules:
- No AI generated content (DALL-E etc…)
- No advertisements
- No gore / violence
- Mutual aid posts are not allowed
NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.
Other 196's:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Some dude in the fucking WSJ is complaining about how hackers look ? What the hell is this?
John Waters made a lot of counterculture films back in the day-- I don't think his tone is complaining
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Waters
What is it then?
Tongue in cheek
Neurotypicals at it again
I feel like he's just lamenting that the youth that are making things happen could make a statement with some distinct fashion. Style has always been important for him so I guess it's somewhat complaint adjacent, but I get the feeling it's less like "damn kids today!" and more like "it'd be better if it were this way".