413

This link goes to Reddit, however, we have used a direct video link to avoid giving them ad revenue.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] BigToe@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

That's completely fair and very possible, but I do disagree morally that it's better to have an abortion than to bring a baby into the world that isn't wanted. Want should not dictate the viability of life nor the concept of basic human right to life. Most times the right thing isn't easy or even what we want, but that should not get in the way of doing what IS right. Should there be better foster care systems and increased funding for both systems and families willing to foster/adopt? Absolutely. But the failure of our government to put spending where it should to assist with fostering/adoption and, as you mentioned, in education and standard of living, does not change the morality of the ending of a baby's life through abortion.

[-] Tavarin@lemmy.world 25 points 2 years ago

It's not a baby, it's a clump of fetal cells that has a 75% chance of failing on its own even without an abortion.

[-] dragonflyteaparty@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago

Adoption doesn't change what pregnancy does to a woman's body. Comments like these focus solely on the fetus and ignore the woman who can have life long consequences of simply carrying the fetus to term.

this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2023
413 points (100.0% liked)

Public Freakout

2514 readers
1 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS