276

It seems like the FOSS community is continuing to grow, and FOSS apps keep getting better (Immich reallh blew my mind recently), which is a big win ๐Ÿ˜Ž but there are still many apps I use that I would kill for an open source alternative. I am curious what you guys think? Are there any apps you'd love alternatives for?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Would you by any chance mind sharing? I was going to make my own, but a good starting point never hurts.

(feel free to say no, I don't want to impose)

[-] MenigPyle@feddit.dk 1 points 7 months ago

Honestly I would if I could.

The reason I redo it is because I change work places... And it's one of those things I could actually bring with me no problem because it doesn't contain confidential data, but also since it's so trivial, I don't think of it until I'm on to the next place.

And I haven't made a new one since last change ๐Ÿ˜‚

What I'd probably do today is to list out the constraints and what I'd like to have work, then ask ChatGPT or Bing AI to make it for me, e.g.;


On a system running Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.8 I should like a simple ping tool. It should be written using best practices, contain a shebang, follow all good guidelines for scripting and for the tools used. It should print out a help section with example if called without arguments. If no flags are provided, it could be hostnames or an IPs. Alternative, it can accept an argument of a CIDR range following a switch, '--range 10.2.3.4/30'. When it has verified the input, the following tests should be made for the IP, hostname or IPs, per IP involved;
  • If IP, PTR lookup
  • if hostname(s), look up A and AAAA records
  • It should try opening all the most common ports using netcat, telnet, nmap or similar
  • It should pretty print a concise and user friendly report of all outcomes

The script should be error free, print out helpful error messages when something occurs and gracefully degrade using 'try/catch' or similar. As far as possible, it should use different functions internally to ensure modualirty and maintainability.


That would give you a Python or Bash script most likely. It's going to give you an 80% done script. Probably also experiment with feeding it a type of output you'd prefer. Hope that helps!

[-] Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml 2 points 7 months ago

I'm sure I'm missing something, but can't nmap do all of this?

[-] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 months ago

I'm actually looking at doing a wrapper around NMap. Personally I'm fine with "Just use NMap" as a solution, but I need something that's usable by people who know only a little about Linux and aren't super comfortable in the command line. So I want to do stuff like enumerating the interfaces and just letting them pick one to scan instead of having to specify a network. I'll probably work in a really basic UI using Dialog or something as well.

[-] MenigPyle@feddit.dk 1 points 7 months ago

I usually have some specific goals I'd like to add, which is why this would be the barebones scaffolding.

That aside, I don't like the output from nmap ๐Ÿ˜œ

[-] Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 months ago
this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2024
276 points (100.0% liked)

Open Source

31351 readers
140 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS