266
submitted 7 months ago by misk@sopuli.xyz to c/technology@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TrainsAreCool@lemmy.one 37 points 7 months ago

I believe a huge chunk of Tesla's valuation is based on their automation tech, despite having very little real success towards full automation. So they have to focus on that and try to prove they can deliver.

But I'm guessing they won't succeed, as there are fundamental flaws with the technology itself, that can't be solved by throwing more sensors at the problem.

[-] maynarkh@feddit.nl 25 points 7 months ago

It seems their stock valuation rests on an assumption that their self-driving tech is unique, useful and best-of-class. I don't see how they can benefit putting these claims to the test by trying to compete in the robotaxi market.

[-] Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz 4 points 7 months ago

Their stock valuation rests entirely on large entities shorting the stock, and other large entities saying “I will take that bet!”. That’s pretty much it.

[-] maynarkh@feddit.nl 6 points 7 months ago

All stock valuation rests on like three entities making numbers up, that's not the thing. The question is how long will Wall Street keep Musky boy on the nice list if he is becoming more and more visibly incompetent.

[-] Claidheamh@slrpnk.net 13 points 7 months ago

But can it be solved by throwing less sensors at the problem? Cause that's what he's been doing. Removing sensors from the newer versions that were in the older ones.

[-] PlutoniumAcid@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Drop the cameras, add lidar instead. That's true 3d vision, which no amount of cameras can replace.

[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 months ago

But people drive with just eyes, why can't cars drive with just eyes? Someone in Tesla accountint probably...

[-] G0ldenSp00n@lemmy.jacaranda.club 4 points 7 months ago

Elon has literally said exactly this so many times. I think it is probably possible to make a car drive with just vision, but you make the task monumentally harder by not having things that ground you in reality, ie. lidar.

[-] TrainsAreCool@lemmy.one 1 points 7 months ago

Someone told them the problem was just "too many variables", so they figured by taking away sensors, there are fewer variables. Therefore, better self-driving.

this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2024
266 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59138 readers
1916 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS