395
submitted 2 years ago by ZippyBot@lemmy.zip to c/gaming@lemmy.zip
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] BossDj@lemm.ee 28 points 2 years ago

https://www.stopkillinggames.com/

Refers to publishers, not developers

They want server based games to release individual hosting capabilities at end of life, like games used to twenty years ago.

I feel like the language they're using (a game as a good/product) could just result in server based games being labeled a service and switching to a monthly fee model. Or setting a predetermined end of life date (changeable to extend but not shorten)?

[-] Maestro@fedia.io 5 points 2 years ago

Monthly fees and published sunsets are fine, because then customers know what they are getting in to. Selling you a single player game for 50 euro, then yanking the game away 3 months later is not.

[-] papelitofeliz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 years ago

But still, why not provide server tools?

this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2024
395 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

4888 readers
63 users here now

The Lemmy.zip Gaming Community

For news, discussions and memes!


Community Rules

This community follows the Lemmy.zip Instance rules, with the inclusion of the following rule:

You can see Lemmy.zip's rules by going to our Code of Conduct.

What to Expect in Our Code of Conduct:


If you enjoy reading legal stuff, you can check it all out at legal.lemmy.zip.


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS