339
submitted 8 months ago by deadsuperhero@lemmy.ml to c/fediverse@lemmy.ml

Server indexes of places for newcomers to join can be instrumental for Fediverse adoption. However, sudden rule changes can leave some admins feeling pressure to change policies in order to remain listed.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FaceDeer@fedia.io 4 points 8 months ago

Oh? I missed where Meta had done bad things to previous Fediverses.

[-] JackRiddle@sh.itjust.works 15 points 8 months ago
[-] FaceDeer@fedia.io 3 points 8 months ago
[-] poVoq@slrpnk.net 8 points 8 months ago

Facebook allowed connecting with XMPP clients for a while and then cut off that access. While they were not the main offender compared to Google, they still did nothing but leech off the XMPP ecosystem until they decided it wasn't in their interest any longer.

[-] FaceDeer@fedia.io 3 points 8 months ago

I'm failing to see what's wrong about this. They used XMPP and then stopped? That seems to be exactly what people angry about Threads federation want Meta to do with ActivityPub.

[-] poVoq@slrpnk.net 7 points 8 months ago

The point is that at no point in time where they actually interested in supporting the XMPP federation. It was only a short term tool for them to capture some audience that it would not have otherwise.

this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2024
339 points (100.0% liked)

Fediverse

17786 readers
22 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS