submitted 1 year ago by Banzai51@midwest.social to c/main@midwest.social

41 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Are we going to block Meta's Threads.net? I get it if people want to keep things open. However, Meta is a proven bad actor. They claim they didn't put in ActivityPub because it was too complicated to get it done at launch, and they can't get EU approval of their service because of the rampant and invasive data they gather. IMHO, they are going to attempt to muscle the fediverse out of the equation.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] mvirts@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

What leverage will threads have over independent instances?

[-] niartenyaw@midwest.social 4 points 1 year ago

i have mentioned this is some other comments, but if threads ends up hosting/owning many of the popular communities within the fediverse (which they certainly will try to do), the independent instances can't do much if threads ever decides to leave the fediverse.

[-] mvirts@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I agree there, but I think the most important response is to encourage users to make accounts through independent instances. Defederation with threads forces users who want threads content to make accounts directly with meta

this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2023

23 points (100.0% liked)

main

1339 readers

6 users here now

Default community for midwest.social. Post questions about the instance or questions you want to ask other users here.

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

seahorse@midwest.social