940

submitted 9 months ago by ElCanut@jlai.lu to c/196

46 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] OR3X@lemm.ee 8 points 9 months ago

Yes, unfortunately in the end he got his way.

[-] veroxii@aussie.zone 22 points 9 months ago

Why "unfortunately"? Surely there's minimal security risk in having solitaire installed? And surely your workplace treats people like adults who can responsibly manage their own time and workload?

[-] OR3X@lemm.ee 11 points 9 months ago

Because it undermines the departments authority to make decisions regarding the systems they manage. Sure him having solitaire in and of itself isn't a big deal, but it sets precedence that decisions made by the department can be overridden if someone simply complains loudly enough. This could be particularly dangerous in the case of new or tightened security policy put forth by the department (this exact scenario did actually playout with another individual a few years later regarding password policy)

[-] CrabLord@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

I agree completely. "Executives" basically anyone above a director level loves to throw their authority aeound. We recently got a new CEO and he wanted to get OneDrive working even though we're a Google shop. At least 3 different teams had to adjust policy and then put him in his own Active Directory OU, because he said "we shouldn't be in the business of telling employees what software they should use, we should just support it."