260
submitted 8 months ago by Alsephina@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] LovingHippieCat@lemmy.world 113 points 8 months ago

Important note for those who dont want to read the actual article: the ban is essentially saying only some flags can be bought with federal funds and then hung up officially, and the pride flag isn't one of them. It also doesn't prohibit personal displays, so while they can't be on flag poles or bought with federal funds, they can still be displayed. Interestingly, the bill also bans the confederate flag. It's still just bigotry being forced by the GOP but there's always more context than a headline can provide.

[-] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 23 points 8 months ago

And the State Department can do whatever it wants. Why would Congress have oversight of a routine maintenance issue for the Executive Branch? They can fly all the pride flags they want and no one can stop them.

The House's budget power only exists until the item is purchased. It's actually not very strong. Literally how are they going to enforce this? The Justice Department will be defending the State Department. The House will have... who?

[-] NounsAndWords@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago

The House will have… who?

Roberts, Alito, Thomas, Barrett, Kavanaugh, and Gorsuch.....

[-] False@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

The House should be about to pass laws that curtail the rights of the executive branch. This is a key part of the system of checks and balances.

this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2024
260 points (100.0% liked)

World News

32341 readers
344 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS