951
submitted 1 year ago by AradFort@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] rambaroo@lemmy.world 59 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Because some right wing rag told him Greta bad. These people are total shills lol. Imagine defending oil corps who wouldn't hesitate fucking you over for a dime.

[-] nexusband@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

How about you just fuck off with your baseless accusations. Nobody tells me what to think, especially not right-wing armchair farts who don't have a clue about tooting and blowing. Both extremist views are absolute junk and have no place in a civilized world and that's exactly why Greta (and the same, it's not just her) gets on my nerves so much.

[-] Mdotaut801@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago

Lol what exactly is “extremist” about Greta?

[-] nadir@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

Oh, she's extremist compared to the political center. Just as people in favor of women's suffrage were in the early 20th century.

Doesn't make her wrong though. It's just damning for the majority.

[-] el_cordoba@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

From what I gather, blocking an oil port is extremist and doesn't actually do anything but make life more difficult for the general population.

From that perspective I can agree with him. Blockading an oil port is an extreme approach to combating climate change. More sensible approaches would be figuring out how to lobby governments to tax fossil fuels and use that money to support renewable resources.

[-] Necronomicommunist@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

You want to enter a bidding war with one of the biggest global industries? Nations literally go to war for fossil fuels.

[-] ABCDE@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

How did what she did make life more difficult for anyone except corporations? No one would have noticed anything, mate.

[-] el_cordoba@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Hmm, in this instance probably. I am worried she'll gather the wrong type of attention and turn more people off than on to climate issues.

[-] ABCDE@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago
[-] el_cordoba@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I am not sure about that. There plenty of people who use her as an example to further their propaganda against progressive movements.

[-] ABCDE@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

No one is paying attention to them.

[-] el_cordoba@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

And people didn't think Trump had a shot back in 2016.

I live in a town that's split down the middle politically and I still see people flying Trump flags even after all the bs he has done. We even had a council member denounce pride month back in June at a council meeting. They think they are fighting the good fight.

Anyway, my point is that there are people who will see what Greta is doing, even if it benefits them, and still fight it because they think their side has their back.

[-] ABCDE@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I really don't care about what's happening in the US.

[-] oscar_falke@sopuli.xyz 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't think you can properly translate "von tuten und blasen keine Ahnung haben" into English. But I appreciate it anyway.

Furthermore, do you care to explain what is particularly extremist about Thunberg's views?

[-] Stelus42@lemmy.ca 32 points 1 year ago

She cares about the environment man! And and she like, stood in front of an oil port!! I can't think of anything more extreme leftist terrorist than that

[-] barsoap@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

To know as much about something as the man in the moon

As to her extremist and disagreeable views, now, I haven't collaborated this properly but have it on very good authority that she prefers vanilla over chocolate pudding. What a monster.

[-] nexusband@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I prefer vanilla over chocolate pudding as well. Good god, what have i become...

[-] nexusband@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Wahrscheinlich nicht - ist mir aber ehrlich gesagt auch Egal, weil es am Ende eh nix bringt. Sobald man bei dem Thema ne andere Meinung hat, ist man eh unten durch. Aber, weil ich ja eig. verständigungswillig bin...hier die Erklärung:

Yes, i care: I've said it in another post, the fact that she (and pretty much everyone else that applauded her) want's to basically stop living life, without proposing or advocating how to do it better or rather using her Plattform to advocate real change without completely demolishing "life" irks me. To quote the other post:

Because I do not agree with the methods and also the basic goal. Basically, just telling everyone to stop living isn’t going to do shit in terms of change. You have to give people a perspective to rally behind the cause - I support the cause, but neither the goal of going cold turkey on fossils from tomorrow morning, nor do I support the way they go about that.

The issue is: The extremist positions are doing more harm than any good, it's one of the reasons the AfD got so big in the last few months and neither the Greens nor any other party seem to understand that all they are doing is playing in to the hands of those right wing extremist positions. It infuriates me beyond comparison and makes me actually mad.

And "the other side" just get's foam around their mouth (wahrscheinlich noch was, was man anders übersetzen müsste, ich bin aber gerade zu verärgert um das ordentlich zu tun - sorry) and put's you in to the same corner. Which is not only absolutely stupid, it also damages Democracy, Free Speech and also our society - probably on the same level as Climate Change itself, because in the end, does it matter if we bash our heads in because of climate change (no water, no food) or because we disagree? Both things can be avoided.

[-] nadir@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The popularity of the AFD is not the fault of the people actually trying to make things a tiny bit better. It's thanks to right wing media and parties (CxU) continuously slandering them after complete failure to improve things even the tiniest bit during their time in power.

Even the most mild and harmless change to somewhat reduce the apocalyptic global warming we're creating is fought tooth and nail by the right wing.

Your argument makes as much sense as the people saying gay people are making things worse by forcing their gayness down everyone's throat. No, right wing people don't want to do anything about climate change and want LGBT people not to exist.

You can't appease those dicks into rationality.

[-] nexusband@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Yes, just close your eyes from the reality^^

[-] rambaroo@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Sounds like something a right wing rag would say.

[-] axexrx@reddthat.com 8 points 1 year ago

Nice. 'Both sides are the same' im just one square short of mingo on my 'Im totally not a republican, But...' card!

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Both extremes are the same.

You slicing the world into exactly two categories (not three or five or seventy trillion but TWO) is divisive and counterproductive.

[-] Surreal@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago

How about you fuck off to right wing communities?

[-] cedarmesa@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[-] rambaroo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

That's good advice.

this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2023
951 points (100.0% liked)

World News

38987 readers
1795 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS