502
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] jtb@feddit.uk 7 points 2 years ago

Suspending them before they have actually done anything wrong is a bit like a pre-crime.

[-] Poob@lemmy.ca 25 points 2 years ago

You don't let pedophiles babysit your kids, and you don't let Facebook federate with your social network.

[-] admiralteal@kbin.social 24 points 2 years ago

You really so sure Meta has never done anything wrong?

[-] Skua@kbin.social 19 points 2 years ago

It's not like "they" are some unknown quantity though, it's the Facebook people. It's not weird or unreasonable for people to not want the company that got fined literally a billion euros for data privacy violations just a couple of months ago to get involved in a thing they like

[-] jtb@feddit.uk 1 points 2 years ago

I'm not on Facebook but I know people who are, and they are just ordinary people who made a poor choice and didn't read the terms and conditions. It's all those people who you are excluding, not just Facebook employees.

[-] Skua@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

All of those people are welcome to make accounts elsewhere on any Fediverse instance, though, just like they were before the launch of Threads. They're not banned. They're not being punished either. There's just going to be less stuff on Threads.

[-] mild_deviation@programming.dev 1 points 2 years ago

That's just a network effect. All we can do is help those people move to platforms that are better aligned with their users' interests.

[-] jtb@feddit.uk 2 points 2 years ago

Even Churches use Facebook. It's not going to be easy.

[-] artisanrox@kbin.social 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

They already spread medical disinfo like wildfire, got someone who sold our state secrets to the highest bidder elected, and house sociopathic terrorists like libsoftiktok. That's enough.

[-] janWilejan@kbin.social 7 points 2 years ago

it's more like suspending someone who has engaged in bad behaviour in the past and is likely/promising to do it again. if you own your own fediverse site, you decide what the rules are and how to enforce them.

the difference between the fediverse and the corporate-controlled social media sites is that you can actually enforce your rules against larger companies on your own corner of the internet.

[-] RemembertheApollo@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

I know very little about the machinery that makes the fediverse work, so forgive me if this seems ignorant: What’s to prevent a malevolent entity from writing their own version of the fediverse that is compatible with the current version and uses the “EEE” philosophy to essentially take over, grow, and kill (or overwhelm) the ‘verse we all use now?

this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2023
502 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

73287 readers
3299 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS