72
submitted 1 year ago by nekandro@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] realitista@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

I don't, but if given a choice between living under a power that's actively attacking and subjugating its neighbors and committing genocides and one that's not, I'll take the one that's not.

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago
[-] realitista@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Interested to hear which countries the US has attempted to annex in the last century.

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Is that the only expression of Imperialism you personally accept? Literal annexation? Hawaii. Vassal states? Cuba. The notion that Imperialism is just Conquest is laughable.

Edit: crickets...

[-] realitista@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Definition of imperialism: The extension of a nation's authority by territorial acquisition or by the establishment of economic and political dominance over other nations.

Definition of hegemony: The dominance or leadership of one social group or nation over others.

I would be a little more nuanced with my definitions personally. I think Russia is textbook imperialist. I think China is borderline imperialist, and I think the USA is more hegemonic.

I think all 3 play all the same games except that the USA doesn't play in territorial expansion, which for me is a big improvement over those that do.

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

The US is built on territorial expansion, lmao. Indigenous Americans who had their land stolen from them have been generationally impacted! The consequences of slavery have set Black Americans back centuries economically! Hawaii was forcibly annexed very recently in a historical frame of viewing!

The US is perhaps one of the most Imperialist countries on the planet, just because it now fights proxy wars rather than direct Conquest doesn't make it any less evil. Here's a hint: the US stopped using Conquest for land acquisition because it already succeeded, not because it's a morally superior Imperialist power.

[-] realitista@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

That's a false equivalence. Every country is imperialist if you go back far enough. My concern is about today's political and security situation, not that of 200+ years ago.

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Buddy, do indigenous people no longer exist? Are Hawaiians extinct? Do black Americans no longer exist? These events have lasting impacts! Despite the entire UN council except the US and Israel voting to open the Cuban blockade, the US is continuing it!

Secondly, if our conversation is about choosing which Imperialist power to live under, you must see why each country is doing what it's doing. The US already conquered the surrounding areas, and now expresses Imperialism through puppet states like Israel.

Your concern is nothing, you just refuse to believe that America is one of the most brutal empires the world has ever known.

[-] realitista@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

So basically ongoing imperialist conquest and subjugation in modern times is justified because anyone did it in the past? Bullshit.

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Fucking no the hell it isn't justified, what are you talking about? You're the one justifying ongoing genocide in Gaza because the US already finished most of its domestic Conquest and genocide.

this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2024
72 points (100.0% liked)

World News

37056 readers
488 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS