970
delicious (slrpnk.net)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Flumpkin@slrpnk.net 6 points 9 months ago

Is microplastic in soil any worse than silicate sand? I mean once it's inert it's inert right? Probably not the best sub to ask this lol

[-] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 11 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Not the right sub, but entirely the right person to be asking this question to.

Like with most soil things, the answer is a mix beteeen "it's complicated' and "we don't know". This may sound like a cop out, but soil science didn't really take off until the 1940s (thanks Jenny), so it's a very new science. On top of that you have multiple disciplines (biology, mineralogy, chemistry, physics, and pedology itself) that tie into soil. Soil itself also has substantial spatial heterogeneity.

Short answer: I don't know.

Long answer: I don't know, but I suspect it might be more labile in soil.

Here is why:

First thing to consider is the chemical and biological resistance of the plastic. Generally plastics are pretty stable to degradation, but plasticizers are more biologically active and can have all kinds of nasty effects.

Stability will ultimately be determined by feedstock (type of plastic) climatic factors, soil chemistry (primarily pH), organic matter content (high OM -> possibly broader soil Ecosystem -> more chance of some weird soil microbe being able to break things down), and particle size (smaller particles break down faster).

Given that soils have more microbial activity (which can generate weak humic acids too - see podzolification), particle size of the plastics are sand sized or less, and that soils are generally in the pH 5-7 range, it's likely that they are more mobile and easily degraded versus inert sand. Whether this gets tied back up into soil organic matter is a whole other can of worms.

So yeah. Idk. I think so though.

If you're comparing micro plastic to just sand in terms of stability - sand is far more stable.

[-] Flumpkin@slrpnk.net 4 points 9 months ago

Oh wow thanks for the detailed answer! I guess the most likely answer is that it probably will degrade over a long time span, and during that time negative effects could happen.

[-] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 4 points 9 months ago

Correct. It's a similar process to geochemical weathering of rocks, which can cause major issues in mining. In that case, the rocks often contain pyrite (sulphide minerals) which are fine if they aren't exposed to oxygen. When you dig up the rock, though it starts a chain reaction which results in low pH leachate, which can then make metals mobile.

[-] gandalf_der_12te@feddit.de 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I believe it's really just like silicate sand. The problem with microplastics isn't actually the plastics itself. Plastics itself is chemically inert and therefore non-toxic. The problems are:

  • Physical: larger junks can cause constipation of the digestive track, which is a problem for some sea animals.
  • Chemical: Plastics often have additives that give them special powers, like blocking UV-light. These additives are often toxic, unfortunately. This is why producers nowadays try to minimize the use of additives in plastics. But still, they are there.
[-] Classy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 months ago

As far as I know, silica doesn't break down into toxic compounds with exposure to weathering, UV radiation and time like plastic does. Microplastic doesn't just stay as it is

[-] Flumpkin@slrpnk.net 2 points 9 months ago

Yeah, check out the other detailed answers.

this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2024
970 points (100.0% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26825 readers
3644 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS