192
submitted 1 year ago by RandAlThor@lemmy.ca to c/world@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 104 points 1 year ago

Its a good thing and we should stop wringing hands over declining population. This is the singular way in which we can mantain a habitable planet for humans, is to have fewer humans.

Pass sensible immigration policies and it becomes a non-issue.

[-] sushibowl@feddit.nl 41 points 1 year ago

The main problem is that most countries don't have their economic system set up for it. The retirement system also in many cases is not sustainable with a shrinking population. This is going to cause a lot of pain and probably countries will start out with policies aiming to increase birth rates to attempt to maintain the status quo.

You're going to face a lot of resistance trying to actually adapt economic policies to a shrinking population. Especially from older people.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

Japan and Italy are both going through this right now. I'm not sure its going particularly well, so I think you are generally correct. We should be putting much more effort into figuring out how to manage this transition, because its both completely necessary, and inevitable.

[-] pennomi@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

As we continue to replace workers with machines it will be easier… but that’s a slow process.

[-] SkippingRelax@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Can't speak for Japan but for Italy an easy way to deal with shrinking population is by allowing more immigration. The one thing the current government is against, and the populace has been conditioned to believe is the main problem causing all sort of issues. Particularly by facilitating an influx of skilled workers, you have from day one taxpayers that can fund your pensions, and that didn't cost you a euro for the first 18 years orbso of their lives (education, health care etc). Of course it's not that trivial as first they should create an attractive job market that makes skilled workers want to go there in the first place but other countries have successfully done that. I'm not counting on this to happen, just saying that it's an option

[-] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago

This some eco-fascist shit, no humans aren't the real virus you Ra'as Al'Ghoul ideating dingus.

Less people just means more work that has to be done by all those machines that directly contribute to the climate crisis via power consumption.

ISTG people be rooting for population decline to fix climate change as if it wasn't what caused the industrial revolution that got us into this mess in the first fucking place.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Ah yes. Sensible immigration policies for countries with declining populations is eco-facism. Daddy chill.

[-] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

Cheering global population decline when the major contributors to global population are low pollution per person countries outside of the west is indeed ecofascism ya context avoidant nonce.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

We should invite them in then. We've got the infrastructure and education systems built. Would be a shame not to use them.

[-] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 1 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

Daddy chill.

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[-] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 3 points 1 year ago

I do the job a of 3 departments back in 1990. tech will replace humans. Some places have automated warehouses and fast food. Getting a head start by reducing humans that needed those jobs is a good thing. Plus if there is less humans there will be less demand which means less work for machine to do anyway. Also, not like machines are not going to be running on better energy. 20 years ago almost no one had a solar panel on thier house.

[-] stoly@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Lol I love watching knuckle draggers cry about eco fascism.

[-] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

This is such a dumb myth. The problem is that we refuse to embrace green energy, not that there's too many people.

If the oil lobby didn't block all progress this would have been solved long ago.

[-] skulblaka@startrek.website 7 points 1 year ago

Energy isn't our only limited resource.

[-] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

A few top% people in the world (mostly western countries) are responsible for the majority of emissions

We throw away a billion more times food than we really consume too. And we just dump everything we don't like into the ocean

Everything is a distribution problem, not an availability problem.

[-] platypus_plumba@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

The problem is that the amount of population doesn't match the way we live. You could create any ideal society and say that overpopulation isn't the issue, or create an underpopulated society and say the way we live isn't the issue.

You're saying "we just need to fix the biggest issues of our society in in order for overpopulation to be a non-issue, easy!"

[-] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm saying we would screw up the earth even if we literally had 1/2 the people. By just dumping even more in the ocean and being even less responsible.

We have an absolute abundance of resources and energy and somehow (oil lobby) we manage to be so inefficient that we will never improve that efficiency unless absolutely needed.

If we had half the humans we would waste twice as much.

[-] TakiMinase@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 year ago

Exactly. Natural attrition is the nicest way to restore balance.

this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2024
192 points (100.0% liked)

World News

46645 readers
2855 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS