606
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Quill0@lemmy.digitalfall.net to c/maliciouscompliance@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Thassar 18 points 1 year ago

Ah, no, swearing is allowed as long as it's vulgarity, profanity is what requires an NSFW tag. It's a very important distinction that the Reddit ToS accidentally makes.

So, in conclusion: Fuck -> No NSFW tag. Hell -> Yes NSFW tag.

[-] 0101010001110100@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

So can't reddit just change the wording of the ToS?

[-] Thassar 12 points 1 year ago

I mean, they can but it takes time to do that and until they do /r/pics is adhering to the letter of the law (or at least an interpretation of it) while spitting in the face of the spirit of the law.

[-] Nollij@lemmy.fmhy.ml 10 points 1 year ago

I'm not sure why everyone thinks the lawyers would get involved. It doesn't matter what the guidelines technically say. Reddit has already proven to be extremely untrustworthy regarding their mod policy. If the admins want the mods out, the mods will simply be out.

But it sets a nice precedent/roadmap for the people still there even after the new mods (who have pledged fealty to the king) are installed. Countless people will do this until they get banned, hurting Reddit where it counts.

this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2023
606 points (100.0% liked)

Malicious Compliance

19660 readers
1 users here now

People conforming to the letter, but not the spirit, of a request. For now, this includes text posts, images, videos and links. Please ensure that the “malicious compliance” aspect is apparent - if you’re making a text post, be sure to explain this part; if it’s an image/video/link, use the “Body” field to elaborate.

======

======

Also check out the following communities:

!fakehistoryporn@lemmy.world !unethicallifeprotips@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS