997
submitted 2 years ago by misk@sopuli.xyz to c/technology@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] darthfabulous42069@lemm.ee 34 points 2 years ago

You'd think with all of the money they're pulling in, they'd invest in solar panels or something to lower their overhead.

Or am I making the mistake of approaching the situation with common sense?

[-] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago

It's Bitcoin, of course common sense isn't involved.

[-] darthfabulous42069@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

I mean, fair, but still. People should push them to go green.

[-] this_1_is_mine@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

With how volatile the value of Bitcoin is I don't know whether or not they feel safe trying to take that money and reinvest it you're walking by one of the coin ATMs that's at one of my local stores I've watched the value of Bitcoin halve its value than double it overnight basically every single day for the last 3 weeks

[-] long_chicken_boat@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago

they should be doing that, otherwise I don't get how they are making any profit with those huge electricity bills. Last time I checked it, with electricity prices it wasn't worth it to mine cryptocurrency.

[-] orrk@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

no, that's the magic of speculative market financing

[-] Huschke@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Maybe pay off would be so far into the future that they don't want to risk it? Who knows how long crypto will be a thing.

[-] darthfabulous42069@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

You can get solar panels for like $100-$200 on Amazon right now. Nice ones. The price of them dropped like a fucking rock since China got involved.

[-] Snekeyes@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Vs. Banks. That have offices, branches, atms, data centers... banking does use more energy yearly. So why not both invest in renewables

[-] stoy@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 years ago

Sure, but how much of the global financial market does crypto represent?

I susptect that the energy consomption per transaction is considerably higher for crypto than for a normal financial transaction.

[-] orrk@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

no, it is exorbitantly higher for a single crypto transaction

[-] stoy@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 years ago

I did find some information about this, and have posted about it in the thread, and you are absolutely right about this in regards to Bitcoin, I did not find a lot of information about other crypto apart from Etherium, which claimed that the energy use of one Etherium transaction would not consume any power at all, which I doubt.

[-] makeasnek@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

Ethereum uses proof-of-stake, there is no "mining" in a traditional sense, so its power consumption is more akin to e-mail than mining crypto. But proof-of-stake leads to centralization over time, which is antithetical to what Bitcoin people want.

[-] darthfabulous42069@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

I agree with you. That still means Bitcoin is on the hook though.

this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2024
997 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

73655 readers
3647 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS