1187
Ancaps (don't) rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 7 months ago by RothyBuyak to c/196
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] NoLifeKing@ani.social 10 points 7 months ago

Bro did you drink paint? Either you are anarchists (anarcho) or Faschist, you by definition can't be both. Faschism is maximum state influence, real faschism is closer to communism than capitalism.

And there is place for capitalism in the concept of anarchy. By definition you can do whatever you want in anarchy. Wich is completely idiotic but that's a different story.

What you describe is a form of Plutocracy not Ancaps or something similar.

[-] nublug 61 points 7 months ago

ancaps are not anarchists was my whole point bud. and no, the point of anarchy is not 'do whatever you want even capitalism lol'. anarchy is recognizing that power over others breeds corruption and endeavouring to flatten hierarchies as much as feasibly possible to limit it. anarchy is 'no ruler' not 'no rules lol wheeee'.

[-] NoLifeKing@ani.social 3 points 7 months ago

And your point is bs because its against a literal definition. You might mean something else, what you mean is rather Plutocracy than ancaps but you don't seem to understand that.

[-] kwedd@feddit.nl 18 points 7 months ago

According to classical anarchist political theory anarcho-capitalism is a contradiction in terms. Private property (as in a select few owning the means to production, not as in personal possessions) will lead to hierarchy and oppression.

Of course self-proclaimed anarcho-capitalists disagree with this point. They believe a free (unregulated) market would be empowering for everybody.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2024
1187 points (100.0% liked)

196

16258 readers
2368 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS