126
submitted 9 months ago by Showroom7561@lemmy.ca to c/bicycles@lemmy.ca

For those who don't know that area, there are multi-use paths (north and south side) separated from the road on Victoria St, where this cyclist was hit.

For a car to hit someone, they would need to be turning in or out of the business entrances without stopping/looking, which would mean they were at fault 100%.

No charges have been laid, but hopefully this will change.

Far too many cyclists being killed in Ontario. When are we going to take things seriously?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Isoprenoid@programming.dev 3 points 9 months ago

Me: Here's my reasoning along with supporting evidence.

You: You're still assuming from nothing.

[-] Oderus@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Referring to a article from 2011 doesn't mean you're arguing with reason. You're using facts from 2 years to assume why the SUV was at fault, while the investigation is still going. You really think you're some sort of Columbo don't you?

[-] Isoprenoid@programming.dev 2 points 9 months ago

You okay, mate? It's not that serious.

this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2024
126 points (100.0% liked)

Bicycles

3103 readers
22 users here now

Welcome to !bicycles@lemmy.ca

A place to share our love of all things with two wheels and pedals. This is an inclusive, non-judgemental community. All types of cyclists are accepted here; whether you're a commuter, a roadie, a MTB enthusiast, a fixie freak, a crusty xbiking hoarder, in the middle of an epic across-the-world bicycle tour, or any other type of cyclist!


Community Rules


Other cycling-related communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS