293

Protesters throw soup at Mona Lisa in Paris (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 9 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

256 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Visitors at Louvre look on in shock as Leonardo da Vinci masterpiece attacked by environmental protesters

Two environmental protesters have hurled soup on to the Mona Lisa at the Louvre in Paris, calling for “healthy and sustainable food”. The painting, which was behind bulletproof glass, appeared to be undamaged.

Gallery visitors looked on in shock as two women threw the yellow-coloured soup before climbing under the barrier in front of the work and flanking the splattered painting, their right hands held up in a salute-like gesture.

One of the two activists removed her jacket to reveal a white T-shirt bearing the slogan of the environmental activist group Riposte Alimentaire (Food Response) in black letters.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

The world is making progress in climate change. This isn't going to make it go faster.

[-] KISSmyOS@feddit.de 15 points 9 months ago

The world is making progress in climate change.

It better hurry the fuck up.

[-] FaceDeer@kbin.social 2 points 9 months ago

Throwing soup on paintings discredits environmentalism to a lot of people. But what they should really be upset about is misleading graphs cherry-picked to look as alarming as possible.

Sea ice is a concerning indicator, sure, but if you look at other news and other graphs about it you'll not find anything like this gigantic drop. In particular in the section of that page about Antarctic ice:

At the beginning of December, ice extents were at record low levels. However, the seasonal decline in Antarctic ice extent subsequently slowed. As a result, by the beginning of the new year, extent was only sixth lowest.

It also notes that Arctic sea ice extents were typical during 2023, so whatever was happening to Antarctic ice wasn't necessarily an indication of global trends.

I am an environmentalist, I want to see continued effort being made on switching to renewable resources and ameliorating the effects of climate change. But I worry that a lot of environmentalists are crying wolf very loudly and it's going to harm the movement in the long run when people realize how overblown some of these arguments are.

[-] KISSmyOS@feddit.de 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

No one cares what people think about the movement in the long run.
Having a long run is the goal.

Personally, I think we have 20 years left in which we can pretend to do something against climate change (because nothing has actually been achieved, CO2-output keeps climbing, completely unaffected by this whole debate).
By 2045, conditions around the equator will trigger a global migration north, then we'll go back to bombing each other at large scale and all mitigation efforts are over.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 6 points 9 months ago

They didn't throw soup on a painting. They threw soup on glass that was in front of a painting. No paintings were harmed in this protest.

[-] FaceDeer@kbin.social 1 points 9 months ago

Okay, amend my comment to read "throwing soup at paintings." Any other changes needed?

[-] Spzi@lemm.ee 10 points 9 months ago

While continuing to tap new oil fields and failing to make sufficient progress. Also, this one isn't about climate, but healthy and sustainable food. Connected issues, but still.

All that aside, to come back to the somewhat dodged question, what would make things go faster?

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

That's the good question. I'm not sure there is one. We ( the world) were slow off the ball on climate change and its not like we move like a power boat, more like a barge.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Well voting for one. Have people tried that?

[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 5 points 9 months ago

Yeah that's helped us so far lmfao

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

If voting did nothing they wouldn't make it difficult.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 2 points 9 months ago

Your reading comprehension is poor. This isnt about climate change. This is about food security.

[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

.... So they threw away food to make a statement?

This is like protesting pollution by purposely throwing oil into the ocean. Generally speaking the act of protest should not directly intensify the problem.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 6 points 9 months ago

A can of soup dude. The trashcans at the Louvre have far more food waste than a can of soup. What larger good can be done with a single can of soup?

[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Feeding a person.

[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 4 points 9 months ago

I mean it's more like knocking over a barrel of water during a rainstorm to bring attention to the fact that people across the world don't have access to clean water. There is more than enough food to go around in Paris, the problem is distribution and greed. You think donating a single can of soup would make a meaningful impact compared to getting on international news to spread your message?

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Random insult back atcha

[-] deft@lemmy.wtf 1 points 9 months ago

Are they?

this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2024

293 points (100.0% liked)

World News

39046 readers

2095 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.