293
submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

Visitors at Louvre look on in shock as Leonardo da Vinci masterpiece attacked by environmental protesters

Two environmental protesters have hurled soup on to the Mona Lisa at the Louvre in Paris, calling for “healthy and sustainable food”. The painting, which was behind bulletproof glass, appeared to be undamaged.

Gallery visitors looked on in shock as two women threw the yellow-coloured soup before climbing under the barrier in front of the work and flanking the splattered painting, their right hands held up in a salute-like gesture.

One of the two activists removed her jacket to reveal a white T-shirt bearing the slogan of the environmental activist group Riposte Alimentaire (Food Response) in black letters.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Grayox@lemmy.ml 62 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It will make the climate crisis be covered in headlines and make it harder to ignore. This IS a legitimate form of protest. They didn't do any harm and brought attention to their cause.

[-] AnneBonny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 1 year ago

They weren't doing it for the climate crisis.

[-] norbert@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah the article is a bit strange. They call them environmental protesters but they seem to have been protesting food insecurity. Which I guess can be considered environmental but isn't usually what I think of.

[-] Grayox@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago

Especially when you consider the famines that yhe climate crisis will cause. And yeah that's piss poor reporting, they call them environmental Protesters multiple times...

[-] Spzi@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

I think that's fine. Unless we're talking about greenhouses or urban indoor gardening, food grows in the environment. If you want to protect the food, you implicitly have to protect the environment, which makes you an environmentalist driven by food. There are lots of hazards which have little to do with climate (or at least which also have other, climate-unrelated causes), which can affect food. Invasive species, plastic, overfertilization, corporations, general socioeconomic disparities, just to name a few.

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

It will make the climate crisis be covered in headlines and make it harder to ignore

No it won't

This IS a legitimate form of protest.

NO, it isn't

[-] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 year ago

you are talking about them. Therefore protest worked. Therefore it was a protest.

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

They tried to destroy a cultural icon. That's the only topic worth talking about.

[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No, they didn’t. They knew it was behind the bullet proof glass and would not be harmed. They did this to draw attention to a cause. It worked.

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

They knew it, huh. Sounds like an admission of guilt.

[-] norbert@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago

They clearly didn't accidentally spill soup so I'm sure their guilt isn't really in question.

load more comments (18 replies)
[-] Tum@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

the Mona Lisa is behind several centimeters of glass. they have absolutely no way to date it with soup.

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

You know why the glass is there? Because some lunatic tried to throw pait at it. You can't justify the act because it's guarded against it. It's like saying it's OK to to launch a missle at me because you know I have an interceptor system.

[-] Grayox@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago

Lmao no they didnt, it has been behind glass for almost 2 decades, facts dont care about your feelings.

[-] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

Well we disagree. I think protests qua protests are interesting to talk about, same for climate protests, civil rights, the role of art, the role of art conservation, and even soup is pretty interesting.

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

In the end, I think it's no different than religious fanatics destroying part of their culture because they disagree with it. They prove nothing. They accomplish nothing.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Couldn't have just used any of the socially acceptable ways to protest? This is France ffs, they are the world leaders in organizing a protest. You piss the French off and you got a march on your hands.

[-] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

there are no socially acceptable ways to protest - that is the definition of protest.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Yes there is no way to protest in France. No one in France has ever taken part in a demonstration complete with signs. Everyone knows that the French people just go gently into that good night when their government does something wrong. It isn't like they have a literal holiday celebrating the storming of a jail.

Everyone heard that? The French never protest. All the million articles you have heard about strikes and demonstrations in France never occurred.

[-] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

isn't "storming a jail" the very definition of not "socially acceptable"?

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Could they vote? No? Nothing to talk about.

Now care to address the rest of the comment or the one gotcha you think you found?

[-] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

I really don't understand your point. You say that throwing soup at a glass display case because of food insecurity is reprehensible, but rioting in the street and attacking the police is socially acceptable because it concerns voting rights?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FaceDeer@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

We're talking about what idiots they are.

Pithy quotes aside, not all publicity is good publicity.

[-] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago

I'm curious what you think is acceptable protesting?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I can get people to talk about me by taking a dump in public that isn't the same as listening to what I have to say.

[-] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

420 million people a year defecate in public, so unfortunately not.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Real public not in the freaken woods. As in people around and seeing it. Jesus.

[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

TIL wood are “fake public”

PS, not a lot of woods in the middle of New Delhi. Or here in Brooklyn, where I saw an unhoused person, taking a crap in the street the other day.

[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

The only legitimate forms of protest are ones that are easily ignored, right?

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Put a million people in the streets and I'll notice. Take out a painting and you're a vandal :::

[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

No one damaged any paintings

load more comments (2 replies)
this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2024
293 points (100.0% liked)

World News

48068 readers
1794 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS