293
submitted 8 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

Visitors at Louvre look on in shock as Leonardo da Vinci masterpiece attacked by environmental protesters

Two environmental protesters have hurled soup on to the Mona Lisa at the Louvre in Paris, calling for “healthy and sustainable food”. The painting, which was behind bulletproof glass, appeared to be undamaged.

Gallery visitors looked on in shock as two women threw the yellow-coloured soup before climbing under the barrier in front of the work and flanking the splattered painting, their right hands held up in a salute-like gesture.

One of the two activists removed her jacket to reveal a white T-shirt bearing the slogan of the environmental activist group Riposte Alimentaire (Food Response) in black letters.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Grayox@lemmy.ml 62 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

It will make the climate crisis be covered in headlines and make it harder to ignore. This IS a legitimate form of protest. They didn't do any harm and brought attention to their cause.

[-] AnneBonny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 8 months ago

They weren't doing it for the climate crisis.

[-] norbert@kbin.social 17 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Yeah the article is a bit strange. They call them environmental protesters but they seem to have been protesting food insecurity. Which I guess can be considered environmental but isn't usually what I think of.

[-] Grayox@lemmy.ml 9 points 8 months ago

Especially when you consider the famines that yhe climate crisis will cause. And yeah that's piss poor reporting, they call them environmental Protesters multiple times...

[-] Spzi@lemm.ee 4 points 8 months ago

I think that's fine. Unless we're talking about greenhouses or urban indoor gardening, food grows in the environment. If you want to protect the food, you implicitly have to protect the environment, which makes you an environmentalist driven by food. There are lots of hazards which have little to do with climate (or at least which also have other, climate-unrelated causes), which can affect food. Invasive species, plastic, overfertilization, corporations, general socioeconomic disparities, just to name a few.

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago

It will make the climate crisis be covered in headlines and make it harder to ignore

No it won't

This IS a legitimate form of protest.

NO, it isn't

[-] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 22 points 8 months ago

you are talking about them. Therefore protest worked. Therefore it was a protest.

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

They tried to destroy a cultural icon. That's the only topic worth talking about.

[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 19 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

No, they didn’t. They knew it was behind the bullet proof glass and would not be harmed. They did this to draw attention to a cause. It worked.

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

They knew it, huh. Sounds like an admission of guilt.

[-] norbert@kbin.social 21 points 8 months ago

They clearly didn't accidentally spill soup so I'm sure their guilt isn't really in question.

load more comments (18 replies)
[-] Tum@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago

the Mona Lisa is behind several centimeters of glass. they have absolutely no way to date it with soup.

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

You know why the glass is there? Because some lunatic tried to throw pait at it. You can't justify the act because it's guarded against it. It's like saying it's OK to to launch a missle at me because you know I have an interceptor system.

[-] Grayox@lemmy.ml 10 points 8 months ago

Lmao no they didnt, it has been behind glass for almost 2 decades, facts dont care about your feelings.

[-] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 6 points 8 months ago

Well we disagree. I think protests qua protests are interesting to talk about, same for climate protests, civil rights, the role of art, the role of art conservation, and even soup is pretty interesting.

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

In the end, I think it's no different than religious fanatics destroying part of their culture because they disagree with it. They prove nothing. They accomplish nothing.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] FaceDeer@kbin.social 3 points 8 months ago

We're talking about what idiots they are.

Pithy quotes aside, not all publicity is good publicity.

[-] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 8 points 8 months ago

I'm curious what you think is acceptable protesting?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

I can get people to talk about me by taking a dump in public that isn't the same as listening to what I have to say.

[-] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 7 points 8 months ago

420 million people a year defecate in public, so unfortunately not.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Real public not in the freaken woods. As in people around and seeing it. Jesus.

[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

TIL wood are “fake public”

PS, not a lot of woods in the middle of New Delhi. Or here in Brooklyn, where I saw an unhoused person, taking a crap in the street the other day.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 7 points 8 months ago

The only legitimate forms of protest are ones that are easily ignored, right?

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Put a million people in the streets and I'll notice. Take out a painting and you're a vandal :::

[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 6 points 8 months ago

No one damaged any paintings

load more comments (2 replies)
this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2024
293 points (100.0% liked)

World News

38849 readers
1447 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS