295
submitted 9 months ago by nekandro@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Count042@lemmy.ml 17 points 9 months ago

Genocide is genocide.

Harm reduction arguments only work to a point. If genocide is still the outcome, then it isn't really harm reduction.

[-] explodicle@local106.com 4 points 9 months ago

If we're here now, then the harm reduction arguments worked while the plan didn't.

[-] Count042@lemmy.ml 8 points 9 months ago
[-] explodicle@local106.com 6 points 9 months ago

We are now in a scenario where we'll settle for a genocidal monster, because we keep voting for harm reduction. Harm reduction failed in practice; it was never a good idea in the first place.

this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2024
295 points (100.0% liked)

World News

32321 readers
598 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS