33
submitted 2 years ago by Berserkware@lemmy.ml to c/fediverse@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] dreiwert@szmer.info 1 points 2 years ago

How would a "built-in protection against centralization" even work?

IMHO, you can only provide tools. You can't prevent people from being stupid and not using them. That's also why by now, e.g. the EU tries to solve such problems through regulation.

[-] federico3@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

The protocol could require "dual-homing" user accounts, where each account is automatically replicated on 2 different instances without need for hacks and workarounds. That would prevent users from losing their account if an instance is shut down, and also make it easy to migrate to a new instance without losing followers etc. The clients following your account always check for updates on both instances and if you move one of your accounts they update automatically.

(This would not create significant additional load on the network: your toots are already being replicated on all instances where you have followers.)

IMHO, you can only provide tools

No, tools are rarely "neutral". They encourage or discourage workflows and behaviors.

this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2023
33 points (100.0% liked)

Fediverse

17677 readers
25 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS