1462
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Saik0Shinigami@lemmy.saik0.com 12 points 11 months ago

Purple isn't a real color. Red + Blue on the color spectrum is Green.

[-] AreaKode@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

color spectrum

Explain. I'm too high to understand this.

[-] Saik0Shinigami@lemmy.saik0.com 17 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Just look at the spectrum chart here. https://www.thoughtco.com/the-visible-light-spectrum-2699036

Red + green = yellow...

Green + blue = cyan...

Red + Yellow = Orange...

Red + blue(indigo) = a color not on the chart? but in between the two colors is clearly green!

We perceive purple as an activation of Red and Blue cones in our eyes... The color itself actually doesn't exist as a discrete wavelength and is a collective hallucination of sorts.

Edit: Also... Brown isn't a color. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wh4aWZRtTwU (whoops, wrong link originally, fixed now.)

[-] Supervivens@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago

Fine do you want to call it a violet onion then? They are basically the exact same damn thing and violet is a wavelength

[-] Saik0Shinigami@lemmy.saik0.com 4 points 11 months ago

https://jakubmarian.com/difference-between-violet-and-purple/

Violet and Purple are indeed not the same thing. Purple exists in that we perceive it... that's not what I'm arguing against. It's just that it's not a "real" color. It's only because of this "mass hallucination" of sorts that we're okay just accepting that it must be a color when it isn't representable as a single spectrum color like every other color. It is purple... but purple isn't a real color, it's effectively just shorthand for saying that this color is both blue and red. It's just you being human.

Brown has the same problem in that it's just dark orange (from the light spectrum perspective). It turns out that brightness context matters to us, so we choose brown to represent a large swath of that.

[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago

I have a shorthand for “only real in the context that it’s real for humans”… hint, it has four letters and starts with “real”.

:) interesting info!

[-] Undaunted@feddit.de 0 points 11 months ago

Just because violet light triggers both red and blue receptors in our eyes, that doesn't mean there is only discrete red and blue light hitting them. It's just that light with 380nm to 450nm wavelength triggers both typed of receptors. So there is violet light.

[-] Saik0Shinigami@lemmy.saik0.com 1 points 11 months ago

violet IS a discrete wavelength. Purple is not.

[-] bstix@feddit.dk 8 points 11 months ago

In short: Purple doesn't have it's own wavelength. Neither does white, black and the entire gray-scale or any mixing of any colour with the gray-scale and probably more. They're called non spectral colours.

It might be easier to understand when considering other types of waves. At least it is for me. A simple sound can also be described as a wave with a frequency, but if we play two sounds at the same time, we can't say that the sum of the waves has any specific frequency. The frequencies don't add up or multiply or mix as average. The combined sound can only be described as the addition of two frequencies.

In musical terms, purple is not a note, but instead a chord or interval. Red and blue can be individual notes, or they can be mixed as intervals. White is noise and black is silence.

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 6 points 11 months ago

Yeah, that doesn't mean it isn't a "real" color.

[-] Saik0Shinigami@lemmy.saik0.com 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Literally does... There's a number of colors that we perceive that are fictitious. This is well known in color theory. https://grantsonnex.com/why-purple-doesnt-exist/ Don't believe me? That's fine. Listen to an actual artist who's whole job it is to understand colors. There is no "purple" on the light spectrum. And if you're the type to say violet=purple... then here you go! https://jakubmarian.com/difference-between-violet-and-purple/

If we cannot define a color by a wavelength... then it's a color we have to define by how it's perceived. That's not a "true" or "real" color. That doesn't mean it doesn't exist or cannot be perceived, but that it only exists because we perceive it and wouldn't otherwise.

"Brown" is also the same problem. Brown only exists in the context of light and darkness. You cannot just produce "Brown" light. You can produce vary levels of "Dark" orange... and in the context of a dark or light background you'll either see it as orange or brown.

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 months ago
[-] Saik0Shinigami@lemmy.saik0.com 1 points 11 months ago
[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

No need to be such an asshole about it. Keep that on reddit.

[-] Saik0Shinigami@lemmy.saik0.com 1 points 11 months ago

And just like reddit... they could have actually read the post. But they didn't. So it looks like we're all redditors here.

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago

Interesting... So they're two different colors right?

So purple is a color.

[-] Shayeta@feddit.de 0 points 11 months ago

I think it's better to make the distinction between color and light wavelenght instead of just saying purple isn't real.

this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2024
1462 points (100.0% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

27173 readers
3115 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS