182

Thoughts on Post-Open Source? (www.theregister.com)

submitted 10 months ago by actual_patience@programming.dev to c/opensource@lemmy.ml

46 comments fedilink hide all child comments

TLDR: Companies should be required to pay developers for any open source software they use.

He imagines a simple yearly compliance process that gets companies all the rights they need to use Post-Open software. And they'd fund developers who would be encouraged to write software that's usable by the common person, as opposed to technical experts.

It's an interesting concept, but I don't really see any feasible means to get this to kick off.

What are your thoughts on it?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] Auzy@beehaw.org 14 points 10 months ago

Doesn't make sense at all.

I keep seeing Redhat used an example, but they contribute a HUGE amount a source code and projects.. Pipewire, systemd, rpm, DBUS and even the main XML addon for VSCode, etc.

I don't think people realise how much poop linux would be swimming in if they went bankrupt..

Redhat are literally one of the big reasons why Linux is so seamless these days, and they're solving a lot of the big problems. And from my understanding, they still contribute the code seperately anyway.

That being said, I agree money needs to go towards developers. However, a lot of them end up hired at major companies. And I don't think this is the way to approach it

this post was submitted on 31 Dec 2023

182 points (100.0% liked)

Open Source

31292 readers

577 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Posts must be relevant to the open source ideology
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

Cloak@lemmy.ml

kevincox@lemmy.ml

CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml

Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml