351
Seriously rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 1 year ago by Scurvotron to c/196
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] teegus@sh.itjust.works 58 points 1 year ago

I'm too scandinavian to get this

[-] lugal@sopuli.xyz 15 points 1 year ago

As a true Scandinavian, do you also speak Hindi?

[-] gerryflap@feddit.nl 9 points 1 year ago

Even as someone who's Dutch this seems quite obvious. I guess it's not obvious to English speaking people because shark is nothing like haj.

[-] bstix@feddit.dk 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Okay, that's odd. Both English and Scandinavian used to be closer on this, using the same original word "sea dog" originated in old Norse or so.

However both languages changed it to something else since that.

Both languages borrowed words from Dutch, but not the same Dutch word.

The English took "Schurk" for scoundrel and applied it to the fish, while Scandinavia took "Haai" describing the fin.

Curiously, Scandinavian also took Schurk and made it into "skurk", but also uses "haj" as a scoundrel just the same as English in the word "loanshark" = "lånehaj" etc.

So the words have the same origin, but it was split in Dutch while being passed back and forth between languages.

this post was submitted on 31 Dec 2023
351 points (100.0% liked)

196

17483 readers
1521 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS