815

Rule of being a free speech absolutist (i.imgur.com)

submitted 2 years ago by sadakos_left_nut to c/196

109 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[+] albert180@feddit.de 28 points 2 years ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

[deleted]

[-] Elkenders@feddit.uk 4 points 2 years ago

Ah so right wing liberals?

[-] Lojcs@lemm.ee 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It's supposed to be about individualism and individual freedom above all else, which is on par with the selfishness imo. Though many are conservatives that use the term to larp as apolitical.

[-] howrar@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 years ago

Looking at this image, I would think that if I'm against authoritarianism, I'd be libertarian right? Yet, from my experience hearing from others who identify as libertarian, they all seem to be rather selfish as you say, or just very short-sighted. Is this a matter of the libertarian name being co-opted for something very different, or is that actually what it means to be libertarian?

[-] archomrade@midwest.social 15 points 2 years ago

Political compasses are a terribly misleading way of understanding political opinions IMHO, I wouldn't read too much into this.

Libertarians tend to be against state authority and all-in with private authority. They are market absolutists and see the expression of influence or power through market dynamics as not just OK but desired, since they consider markets to be meritocratic.

I would say you can be anti-authoritarian and pro-democracy (i.e. power is still exerted through a state authority, but the state is more evenly represented by the people)

The issue with libertarianism is that it only sees the abuse of power being that which is exercised through the state, but I think most people recognize that to be an incomplete picture.

[-] Phillaholic@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 years ago

Also libertarianism only exist in theory / ideals. No society exists under it in any meaningful way. Their ideas have never been tested to the point where the consequences of their action have not been clearly seen.

They want to think everything is black or white, but in reality it’s different shades of gray.

[-] Deft@lemmy.fmhy.ml 3 points 2 years ago

its a scale and individually on every topic you may be in a different quadrant

[-] Lojcs@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

You can be against authorities limiting your freedom without thinking other people's rights also limit your freedom. It's a spectrum. I don't know what it actually means to be libertarian but it makes sense to me that the polar opposite of authoritanism is selfishness. I think it's the best to not take it to either extreme.

[-] Elkenders@feddit.uk 5 points 2 years ago

I consider myself liberal and it's not about my own freedoms (though I guess I'd like that too) but those of others. Believing others have a right to be non-binary as an easy example, or believe whatever they choose. I don't believe corporations in particular have a right to authority over the individual. Isn't that considered liberal?