13
๐ - 2023 DAY 15 SOLUTIONS -๐
(programming.dev)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2023
13 points (100.0% liked)
Advent Of Code
764 readers
1 users here now
An unofficial home for the advent of code community on programming.dev!
Advent of Code is an annual Advent calendar of small programming puzzles for a variety of skill sets and skill levels that can be solved in any programming language you like.
AoC 2023
Solution Threads
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
| 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
| 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
| 25 |
Rules/Guidelines
- Follow the programming.dev instance rules
- Keep all content related to advent of code in some way
- If what youre posting relates to a day, put in brackets the year and then day number in front of the post title (e.g. [2023 Day 10])
- When an event is running, keep solutions in the solution megathread to avoid the community getting spammed with posts
Relevant Communities
Relevant Links
Credits
Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient
console.log('Hello World')
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Rust
Part 1 was super simple with
wrapping_addandwrapping_mulon au8. Building an actual hash map in Part 2 was nice.That array initialisation is pure poetry! ๐
I'm not fluent in Rust, but is this something like the C++ placement new? Presumably just declaring a table of Vecs won't automatically call the default constructor? (Sorry for my total ignorance -- pointers to appropriate reading material appreciated)
You can create an array filled with all the same values in Rust, but only if all values have the same memory representation because they will be copied. That just doesn't work with Vec's, because they must all have their own unique pointer. And to have uninitialized values at first (think NULL-pointers for every Vec) while creating each Vec, something like this is apparently needed.
The appropriate way would certainly have been to store the map as a
Vec>instead of an array, but I just wanted to see if could.Ah, I see! Thank you.