1261
submitted 11 months ago by DacoTaco@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

While they were happy with what the fairphone 4 brought to the table, they seem to like what was changed for the fairphone 5.
What are you guys' opinions on this? A welcome change? would you get one if your phone died within the next year?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] kttnpunk@lemmy.world 22 points 11 months ago

I want a fucking headphone jack, thanks. Also 3 full size USB ports, a physical keyboard and a inch-thick battery, because fuck you.

[-] kamen@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

They got us in the first half.

[-] kttnpunk@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Okay but I'm absolutely serious and I bet a lot of the upvotes on that ARE unironic. There is a market for chunky, powerful portable devices -few manufacturers seem to want to cater to that type of customer however, probably because of a worldwide capitalism hegemony that exists to make you as placated and dumb as possible rather than empower you as a individual or something

[-] InvaderDJ@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

It's definitely more than the market is not large enough or willing to pay enough to make it worth while. A phone with 3 USB ports, a physical keyboard and a huge ass battery?

That's not a phone, that's a laptop. The amount of people willing to pay for that is going to be miniscule.

[-] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago

Capitalism isn't purposeful in that way. One company might be, but if there was really a huge demand for that kind of thing someone would make it.

[-] kttnpunk@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

You're mistaken. Imperialism is capitalism, my friend. War is just easy profit to some. Regardless, tech companies LOVE to work with the state to design products; most motherboards do have backdoors used by the likes of the NSA. So I think there's a fair case to be made for it being more of a don't-piss-off-the-government decision rather than scarcity of parts or demand.

[-] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

There are products like the pinephone or what have you and they aren't very successful, because most people demand convenience and not seeming weird to their peer group, both understandable impulses even as they lead us astray.

The government isn't stopping manufacturers from making phones with bigger batteries and headphone jacks.

[-] kttnpunk@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

@invaderDJ @Porous_gray_matter. SBCs and their recent popularity show there IS a demand, as well as the existence of the pinephone period. I'm not convinced either. The government, -especially the USA's undeniably has a vested interest in keeping versatile, powerful technology out of reach for most.

this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2023
1261 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59227 readers
3104 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS