68
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by someguy3@lemmy.ca to c/outoftheloop@lemmy.world

A couple months ago the findings against Hunter Biden were nothing, not even worth taking to court, only under GOP pressure did the Trump appointed prosecutor take it to court. Now it seems like a big deal and 17 years (max). What happened? Why the change? Was new evidence found?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Echo5@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

You’re correct, and I’m not going to say I don’t have a bias. But the result I wanted to produce is a more-informed perspective by encouraging people to do their own research, especially after asking a question in a forum where you’ll mainly get answers along the same line of thinking. The rest is just headlines.

[-] paradiso@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

It seems these posts follow the reddit method. If you aren't left leaning, you will be downvoted and shunned. No nuanced discussion. Only red v blue. I'm right, you are wrong.

this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2023
68 points (100.0% liked)

Out of the loop

13106 readers
1 users here now

A community that helps people stay up to date with things going on.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS