68
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by someguy3@lemmy.ca to c/outoftheloop@lemmy.world

A couple months ago the findings against Hunter Biden were nothing, not even worth taking to court, only under GOP pressure did the Trump appointed prosecutor take it to court. Now it seems like a big deal and 17 years (max). What happened? Why the change? Was new evidence found?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Jaccident@lemm.ee 32 points 2 years ago

It isn’t. The point is that accruing back taxes requires payment and may, at the discretion of the IRS, mandate a criminal charge. He wasn’t charge at the time because he paid, but he could have been. So now they want him to have been.

However I think neither party really wants things to go this way, and Republicans are going to see lots of retaliatory investigation and charges brought over missed payments etc. should they pursue this.

A waste of time and money, doesn’t improve anything in the world, just creates more division. Basically the GOP motto.

this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2023
68 points (100.0% liked)

Out of the loop

13229 readers
1 users here now

A community that helps people stay up to date with things going on.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS