708
submitted 1 year ago by boem@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Satelllliiiiiiiteeee@kbin.social 160 points 1 year ago

Sorry, best we can do is massive, expensive pseudo-luxury SUVs

[-] grayman@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

I wouldn't call Kia nor Hyundai nor Toyota nor Honda anything close to pseudo luxury. Has the bar been lowered because of all the plasticated electronics and DUAL ZONE AC?

[-] lemann@lemmy.one 20 points 1 year ago

The fit and finish of interiors in general has really fallen... literally plastic everywhere. Uphostery, leather, wood/wood-effect etc are all mostly gone

[-] Nollij@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 year ago

There's quite a wide range within those brands. Is it safe to say that you would consider Lexus or Acura to be at least pseudo luxury? What about their entry models that are just a rebranded version of the Honda/Toyota model?

Hell, how do we even define luxury? You can get heated leather seats in just about anything these days, and a few decades ago those were both ultra premium options.

[-] grayman@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Lexus & Acura, yes, entry level luxury. I've never seen one that clearly competes with higher end brands. The similar lower models I think are faux luxury. The cheapness is not hard to find.

American BMW & Mercedes to me are clear moderate / mid level luxury. Most models anyway. I say American because I've seen some very low trim models in Europe. Also, those brands are just my example. I know there are others.

I define luxury as long lasting comfort, high level quality control, sound insulation, responsiveness, economics, durability, etc.

Luxury certainly has changed over time. Just my opinion.

[-] ElegantBiscuit@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

The large profit margin SUVs are necessary for a company to achieve scale to then be able to produce the smaller cheaper stuff. Fixed costs like the factory, tooling, training, designing, that all takes a lot of money up front before even selling a single vehicle, and the smaller and cheaper the vehicle coming out of that production pipeline is, the longer the payback period will be. And when we’re talking about billions of dollars in cost, it’s hard to remain solvent when interest payments on the debt grow exponentially over time.

It’s why before tesla there had not been an American auto company startup for like 70 years, Tesla almost went bankrupt, and Rivian is just starting to head in the right direction. Lucid is probably fucked and they’re mostly Saudi owned these days anyways, and the rest of the US EV startup space ranges from a joke to a scam.

What legacy automakers already have in staff and part of the production line established is actually kind of useless when they have to wait to establish their electric motor, battery, and chassis production, which probably just means a new factory anyways. Give it a few years and the cheaper smaller stuff will come, because right now AFAIK only tesla actually has the free cash flow to fund an EV economy car at scale. Everyone else is still sinking billions establishing any EV production at all, and interest rates aren’t helping the speed of their progress either.

[-] cyd@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

There's more than one way to skin a cat. The Chinese EV companies that have come up in the last few years use a diversity of business strategies, not all involving high margin SUVs. BYD's cars, for example, are spinoffs of its battery manufacturing business.

[-] ElegantBiscuit@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

BYD was selling ICE vehicles up until March of 2022, and their current split is somewhere around 50/50 BEV/hybrid so they’re still not a full EV company. Their lineup is still being supported by their existing infrastructure, subsidized by the already established supply chains for ICE that they can incrementally cannibalize while building up the EV part of the company. It’s a good blueprint for legacy auto, but not for an EV startup. That is even before mentioning the very generous subsidies and incentives for electrification provided by the national, provincial, and city governments to producers and consumers. Not to say there is anything wrong with that, because I believe the US also needs that level of investment into electrification, but my point is that it’s not the same business model.

[-] cyd@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

BYD also put lots of resources into electric buses. Anyway the point is that there's multiple game plans EV makers can follow, not only Tesla's.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I'm not sure you understand economies of scale and profit margin.

[-] USSEthernet@startrek.website 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I wouldn't even call Tesla expensive (to make) or luxury. Every Tesla I've been in has seemed empty, plain, and feels cheap. The only expensive part about it is the batteries and the labor to make it. I'm sure the price is just inflated due to all of the attention and hype that company has received over the years.

this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2023
708 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59673 readers
2859 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS