1
submitted 2 years ago by thervingi@lemmy.ml to c/fediverse@lemmy.ml

Not sure why Signal gets all the attention when Matrix is much more successful at spreading open source messaging and is also decentralized.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] sexy_peach@feddit.de 0 points 2 years ago

but Telegram doesn't even have encyption, lol

[-] thervingi@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

Of course it does. It just doesn't have E2E encryption by default (you can turn it on with secret chats). If the alternative is messaging on Instagram, Facebook Messenger or WhatzApp, then Telegram is superiour.

[-] sexy_peach@feddit.de 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

listen to yourself, it doesn't have e2e encryption by default?? So the telegram servers can see your chats, that's not acceptable for a chat software.

e2e also doesn't work in groups on telegram the last time I checked, so the chat with a couple of friends is out for grabs by whatever jurisdiction telegram is operating under as well, great.

Signal is like 5 times better than this, so is whatsapp (depends though) and of course matrix or xmpp. Comparing it to instagram messaging is a joke.

[-] thervingi@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

We actually don't know what WhatsApp is doing. It's a closed source app, so there is nothing preventing Facebook from getting your keys and reading your chats. It just takes one national security letter to force them.

Telegram wins because it's usable by non-techies. And has open source clients. And has a decent Linux client. It's preferable to chatting over Instagram.

this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2022
1 points (100.0% liked)

Fediverse

17732 readers
35 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS