697
submitted 11 months ago by FauxPseudo@lemmy.world to c/skeptic@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] darth_tiktaalik@lemmy.ml 10 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

This is actually a perfect representation of the shallow "research" conspiracy theorists do.

Quoting only the first few lines of an abstract outlining a problem/open question then ignoring the rest of the paper where they address the issue in the abstract.

This way, they can claim that the paper says the exact opposite of what it does.

this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2023
697 points (100.0% liked)

Skeptic

1287 readers
117 users here now

A community for Scientific Skepticism:

Scientific skepticism or rational skepticism, sometimes referred to as skeptical inquiry, is a position in which one questions the veracity of claims lacking empirical evidence.

Do not confuse this with General Skepticism, Philosophical Skepticism, or Denialism.

Things we like:

Things we don't like:

Other communities of interest:

"A wise man proportions his belief to the evidence." -David Hume

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS