887
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FatTony@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

Everytime I see this sentence my brain just refuses to understand it. What does this mean?

[-] JungleJim@sh.itjust.works 27 points 2 years ago

It means to not assume a person is evil if their actions could be explained by them being stupid instead.

[-] pixelscript@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 years ago

It gets clearer if you flip it around to sound less poetic:

Do not attribute to malice that which can be explained by stupidity.

That which can be explained by stupidity, do not attribute to malice.

Or perhaps in more direct words someone might actually say:

If you can explain it with stupidity, it's probably not malice.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

You are walking on the street and a big fat guy bumps into you. Assume they are just clumsy don't assume they were trying to run you down.

This doesn't mean be unaware, this doesn't mean ignore red flags, this doesn't mean to not have a healthy level of caution. It means assume good faith from deeply imperfect people until evidence no longer supports it.

[-] Shard@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

It means if you don't know if someone did something because they had evil plans or were fking stulud, its safe to assume they were fking stupid at the point of the incident.

Especially if the evil plan would have been convoluted and required things to align just perfect for the plan to be successful.

[-] hglman@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 years ago

But it is not safe to make that assumption. It's wildly dangerous to label evil as stupid. Giving evil people an in is how we get to where we are.

[-] Shard@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

I was just explaining to the commenter above what was meant by the saying. I never said it was correct in all situations.

If you have an issue with the saying, you're free to give Robert j. Halon your feedback.

[-] hglman@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

Unfortunately you are also responsible for what you say and do.

[-] Aqarius@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

It's called Hanlon's razor, a take on Occam's razor, the unstated part is "all else being equal".

[-] hglman@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

Yeah and its wildly misused and dangerous.

[-] blue_struct@feddit.de 5 points 2 years ago
this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2023
887 points (100.0% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

12853 readers
1155 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article

--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS