453
submitted 1 year ago by thehatfox@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Renacles@discuss.tchncs.de 28 points 1 year ago

The guy might be a nutjob but I don't think he's talking about getting them back through war, Argentina has next to no military.

Having colonies in the year 2023 is ridiculous though, I don't know why so many comments act like Britain is in the right here in any way whatsoever.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago

Since when were the Falklands an example of colonialism? Nobody lived there until the Europeans showed up.

[-] BenadrylChunderHatch@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

If you think the Falklands should be part of Argentina, logically Hawaii should be part of Kiribati. Alaska should be Russian/Canadian, etc etc. If you think about it for more than a minute it becomes clear that geographical location is not the only factor or even the most important one.

[-] PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

Wait, can we give Sarah Palin to Canada? Seems like a fair trade to me.

[-] Snowpix@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

You guys can take Justin Bieber and Pierre Polivre. We don't want them. I'm sure we can find some remote shed to lock Palin away in while you look after those two.

[-] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

geographical location is not the only factor or even the most important one

I'm pretty sure that if another country took over Hawaii, or the Catalina Islands off the coast of California, especially just for being able to put a marker down on future oil reserves, that the US would not be ok with that claim.

Also, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falkland_Islands_sovereignty_dispute .

[-] Apollo@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago

Even if your bullshit wasn't bullshit, theres another huge difference you are ignoring - the US is capable of doing something about it, Argentina is not.

[-] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

the US is capable of doing something about it, Argentina is not.

Well, they did try, and failed, but it was costly for both sides, so it wasn't a hard one-sided affair.

Besides, that's not the point I'm trying to make, and not relevant to this discussion. The point of legal ownership by "first rights", and not "might makes right", is what I'm speaking towards.

[-] Apollo@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 months ago

Cool, so since Britain has held the islands longer than Argentina has existed you consider the matter settled?

[-] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Cool, so since Britain has held the islands longer than Argentina has existed you consider the matter settled?

No. Think Argentina has the strongest claim based on previous ownership from Spain, and being the nearest nation to the islands.

[-] RobertOwnageJunior@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

But the first settlement there was french, so you're wrong.

[-] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

But the first settlement there was french, so you’re wrong.

They left though, and then Spain was there.

[-] kaffiene@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Agreed about owning colonies. But that's not what this is.

Because the population of the Falklands (that we installed there) want to remain part of Britain for whatever stupid reason.

[-] ABCDE@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

No one else was there. Why would they want to be part of anything else?

this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2023
453 points (100.0% liked)

World News

39023 readers
1835 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS