453
submitted 2 years ago by thehatfox@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] theinspectorst@kbin.social 99 points 2 years ago

'Get them back'. What does 'back' even mean in this statement? Of all the countries that have ever legitimately ruled the Falklands, Argentina was never one of them.

The penguins have a better claim to the Falklands than Argentina...

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

#FalklandPenguinRule2024

#PenguinEmpireRising

[-] Taringano@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I agree it's more British than Argentinian. But "Argentina never one of the rulers" isn't quite right. There were several stints of Argentinan (or Spanish but back when that was the same thing) occupation long before the war.

[-] theinspectorst@kbin.social 25 points 2 years ago

Yeah, Spanish. That's the point. There were penguins, then was French, it was Spanish, it was British. It was never Argentinian. There were never civilians there.

The only civilians who have lived there are the Falkland Islanders, who identify as British. Argentina's claim is based on the Spanish once having a very limited military presence there, on which basis they want to assert some sort of imperialist sovereignty over a bunch of civilians whose ancestors have been there for hundreds of years and who have only ever considered themselves British.

[-] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

There were penguins, then was French, it was Spanish, it was British. It was never Argentinian.

They inherited the islands from Spain (as per their claim) when they won their independence from Spain.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falkland_Islands_sovereignty_dispute

Those islands are allot closer to Argentina than Great Britain, and closer to Argentina than Hawaii is from the US.

[-] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

That would give Spain a claim on them then, not the country that exists because it said it was not Spain.

[-] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
[-] Luisp@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago

Malvinas islans are legally and physically part of Argentina and this is accepted by a majority in the UN, they are also the symbol of the centrist liberals (imagine the island of the statue of liberty) so this new neonazi psycho (and elon fan redditor) wants to "eliminate" their symbols including the ministries, universal health care, education systems, social plans that support several million of poor and make their party illegal

[-] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago

The metric by which Argentina has a legal claim on the islands would also give the US a claim.

Argentina is making the case for being invaded by the US under the causus belli of defense from an invading force whenever they say they get to eat the Falklands because something something tordesillas

[-] PrMinisterGR@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago
[-] Luisp@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 years ago

That's not what I'm debating here, what I debating is that the new far right regime is willing to sacrifice sovereign land just to make a point, to "own the leberals"

[-] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

IT IS NOT SOVEREIGN LAND THO

this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2023
453 points (100.0% liked)

World News

48917 readers
1572 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS