97
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Erasmus@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

It really blows my mind that Apple doesn’t offer this as a free service for owners of the phone. I mean can you imagine this as a selling point for parents alone?

[-] Nogami@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Not sure what you’re talking about. Did you even read the article? It’s free and always has been. They’ve never even brought up a price.

The stories of people saved are marketing gold for Apple.

[-] limonfiesta@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

The only context to view their language (extending free year) is that they intend to switch to some form of a paid model i.e bundled or standalone.

I'm not commenting on whether that's good, or bad, just that it's clearly what they are planning on doing. Otherwise, they wouldn't use that specific language.

[-] Nogami@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It’s called keeping your options open. I don’t expect it to go paid, ever.

Can you imagine the negative publicity if some family with little kids dies because it’s behind a paywall? Me neither. Won’t happen but it keeps their competitors off balance.

[-] Erasmus@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I did read the article but maybe I am confused so feel free to clarify for me.

The article states:

‘Apple extends Emergency SOS via satellite for an additional free year for existing iPhone 14 users’

So the implication is it isn’t free after that time. What about other iPhone users? Is this free for everyone irregardless who has any model iPhone or just the 14?

[-] limonfiesta@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

The implication is that Apple's language is very specifically implying this is a fee-for-service product, but that they are waiving that cost for a defined time period. They may extend that again, or several more times, but they are going out of their way to NOT say it's just free, or simply an included feature e.g. FindMy.

If their intent was to have it be an included service, they would NOT include the language about how long it will remain free.

[-] Nogami@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Releasing too much info gives your competitors an advantage. Keeping them in the dark keeps them guessing.

Guessing they’ll be moving to starlink at some point in the future and it will get even more affordable.

I don’t see it being an incredibly expensive service for them to provide given the obvious public relations gains, especially when they just said they’d be opening it for auto incidents too. Super high volume compared to a few (hundred?) rescues.

That said, I could see the auto coverage being a paid service down the road. Pun intended.

[-] LifeInOregon@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

That’s exactly what they’re doing right now. They’ve not made an indefinite commitment to it, but it’s the second free year for a device enter its second year.

this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2023
97 points (100.0% liked)

Apple

17476 readers
45 users here now

Welcome

to the largest Apple community on Lemmy. This is the place where we talk about everything Apple, from iOS to the exciting upcoming Apple Vision Pro. Feel free to join the discussion!

Rules:
  1. No NSFW Content
  2. No Hate Speech or Personal Attacks
  3. No Ads / Spamming
    Self promotion is only allowed in the pinned monthly thread

Lemmy Code of Conduct

Communities of Interest:

Apple Hardware
Apple TV
Apple Watch
iPad
iPhone
Mac
Vintage Apple

Apple Software
iOS
iPadOS
macOS
tvOS
watchOS
Shortcuts
Xcode

Community banner courtesy of u/Antsomnia.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS