496
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 45 points 1 year ago

Would that really suprise you coming from Mexico? Like good on the people to elect them, and respect for being them for open about who they are, but the country has some serious issues and this isn't near the top of the list unfortunately.

[-] Sacha@lemmy.world 78 points 1 year ago

You say that like they didnt legalize gay marriage, elect LGBTQ allies, strengthen and protect abortion laws in response to the roe vs wade overturner, and legalize pot. And that's just to name a few.

Oh and you don't lose your house if you have to go to the hospital without insurance.

Say what you will about Mexico, but in some aspects it's more advanced than United States. At least when it comes to the red states.

[-] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 24 points 1 year ago

I didn't say anything like that in my statement. I also didn't imply anything like that in my statement.

Don't put words into people's mouths.

[-] Sacha@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Honey, you don't need to outright say something for the implications and subtext to be there.

[-] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

And sometimes there isn't subtext. Or you just absolutely miss the fucking point.

[-] voracitude@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Would that really suprise you coming from Mexico? Like good on the people to elect them, and respect for being them for open about who they are, but the country has some serious issues and this isn't near the top of the list unfortunately.

What exactly did you mean by this? Because it sure reads like you're saying "Mexico is unfriendly towards LGBTQ+", because you think this shouldn't be surprising "coming from Mexico".

There is evidence for a counterpoint to this implied statement: that Mexico is not unfriendly to LGBTQ+, but your response to that evidence was "I didn't say they didn't (enact legal protections, etc etc), don't put words in my mouth", so what exactly did you mean by what I quoted from you?

[-] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

In a country that has a high amount of politically motivated violence, an elected official (especially one that would be progressive) being killed isn't really a surprise to me.

Legal protections does not equal a friendly attitude. As I have experienced in my country (as we have had legal same sex marriage since 2005, and being allowed to serve in the CAF since 1992 as LGBTQIA+ individuals and being the second country legalise pot nationwide, second to Uruguay).

We still get warnings about kidnapping and cartel violence when we book trips to resorts there (among all the other warnings like the water isn't exactly safe).

So yeah, a memeber of my community being murdered while in a position of power in Mexico isn't that big of a surprise. My initial thoughts was this was cartel violence. And apparently one of the AGs in the region demonstrated a lack of empathy or corruption in thier initial statement. But it could be violence against them for being NB.

So yeah, sad but not a shock.

[-] voracitude@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Right, so, you do mean "violence against LGBTQ+ people is unsurprising from Mexico"; so the other poster wasn't putting words in your mouth, they correctly interpreted your meaning.

What they said was

you say that like they haven't [passed all these progressive laws]

You gave a very valid and pithy response here:

Legal protections does not equal a friendly attitude.

Glad we could clear that up! 😊

[-] possum@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

While it isn’t surprising in Mexico, it is also not surprising from any other country either. Not sure what’s the point of singling it out.

[-] nicetriangle@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah honestly if something like this happened in one of the redder states in the US I would not be remotely surprised.

[-] Adramis 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Living in a red state, I would? It's not every year that an elected official gets whacked, even one that's a member of a hated minority. For reference, there's been 57 assassinated government officials in the US total: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_assassinated_American_politicians

Saying "Eh this is just par for the course all countries are like this" feels like it minimalizes the problem.

[-] Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

"Not every decade" is maybe a poor choice of words given your supplied evidence. Though technically it does look like 2 decades were skipped... but a handful of decades had more than 5 to make up for those skipped decades.

"Not every year" would at least be a much more defensible statement given your provided context.

[-] Adramis 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah, that's fair. FWIW it's still uncommon enough that "Eh it happens" isn't reasonable.

[-] TheActualDevil@sffa.community 4 points 1 year ago

That might be due to our heavy government surveillance system. Remember, it wasn't that long ago that a militia was arrested before they could carry out their plan to kidnap the governor of Michigan. The year before that a Coast Guard lieutenant was arrested before he could kill journalists and Democrat politicians. There was that nutjob who took a hammer to Pelosi's husband's head (Didn't even catch that one in time!) There's tons of attempts to assassinate presidents. Kinda feels pretty par for the course.

But the original point, I think, was that it's kinda weird for someone to say it's not surprising for it to happen in Mexico, as if it's some third world country run like New York in Escape from New York while pretending it doesn't happen in the US frequently. The US is just a bigger police state so they catch most of them before anyone dies. The FBI has plants in militias and groups like them all over the country specifically to catch this kind of thing. Most governments just can't afford that kind of manpower. The US is not special or really that much safer, and comments normalizing this kind of thing for Mexico is why anyone even made that argument. It's definitely shitty, and probably racist to think that it's reasonable, when it's in Mexico, people say "Eh it happens.”

[-] BetaBlake@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

What? This would be pretty damn surprising, please don't fight ignorance with more ignorance, it's not a good look

[-] nicetriangle@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

Pretty damn surprising to you maybe. I'm speaking for myself.

[-] can@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

It would be surprising they were stabbed not shot?

[-] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago

I would be surprised they would elect a LGBTQ+ friendly politician in the first place

[-] Nepenthe@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

In general, or just in red states? Cross-referencing LGBT politicians with their states' historical political leanings, an openly LGBT politician has been elected or reelected while their state was considered republican a total of 96 times. The lead is actually a three-way split between Florida, Georgia, and Arizona, each with a total of 9.

So. Less than it perhaps should. Way more than you'd think.

[-] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago

I would be surprised they were stabbed rather than shot. US conservatives are too cowardly for a knife fight.

[-] sergih@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

Pretty sure asassination of politicians is up there with the rrst of serious stuff that thr country has problems with, what kind of take is yours?

this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2023
496 points (100.0% liked)

World News

39082 readers
2434 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS