166
submitted 11 months ago by graded6827@feddit.uk to c/uk_politics@feddit.uk
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Nighed@sffa.community 5 points 11 months ago

He wasn't intentionally bad though, he just made a (huge) miscalculation about how much the leave campaign were willing to lie.

[-] 520@kbin.social 10 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

A lot of people were making the same miscalculation. You have to remember this was around the same time as Donald Trump's presidential campaign. It wasn't widely known just how powerful that tactic really was yet. A lot of people were laughing at the obvious bullshit, confident that it'll never fly, but were oblivious as to just how many were buying into it.

[-] brewery@feddit.uk 6 points 11 months ago

Why did he leave then straight away and dissappear from public life? He's completely arrogant and only cares about power. Why didn't he have a plan is it did go wrong? He's grossly incompetent. Any half decent government should prepare plans for even unlikely situations if they are possible and would cause so much damage.

[-] Nighed@sffa.community 4 points 11 months ago

To be fair, having a pro remain leader in charge of Brexit would have pissed of the Brexit crowd. Probably would have given a better outcome though.

[-] brewery@feddit.uk 2 points 11 months ago

If he came out and said he will follow the will of the people and appoint a pro brexit person to lead a new dept and also lead negotiations, I think he could've got away with it. At least he could've seen through a transition to a new govt rather than just abandon it everything.

Maybe he shouldn't have pissed off the brexit crowd with those govt paid leaflets and the support he gave. He should've planned something for what would happen if the vote didn't go his way. We could've at least figured out what type of brexit the country wanted as a binary yes - no was not enough.

I see what you mean though, maybe it was just never possible and it was his only option. I just think he caused the most damage to this country ever and somehow is getting away with it with seemingly no consequences. No matter what, he is so linked to this situation in a negative way he should not be in politics anymore, either as a cabinet member or lord

[-] FishFace@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

No matter what he wanted it probably would've gone worse for him to have remained. Can you imagine what the ERG would have attempted had he stayed? They only just about let May get in.

[-] brewery@feddit.uk 2 points 11 months ago

Then it's fine that he left but he shouldn't be allowed back in surely?

[-] FishFace@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Why not? Enough time has passed now that the aftermath, or at least the immediate aftermath, has all been handled.

[-] jamrom@feddit.uk 4 points 11 months ago

He was a Eurosceptic masquerading as a pro-EU campaigner. He gambled his power with different referenda (AV in 2011, Scottish independence in 2014, and the UK self-sanction in 2016).

He looks competent, but he's directly and indirectly caused so much harm to this country.

[-] HeartyBeast@kbin.social 4 points 11 months ago

He was a Eurosceptic masquerading as a pro-EU campaigner

I don't think there's much evidence that suggests that. What he was, was complacent about Remain's chances of success - and he wasnt the only one.

[-] DakRalter@thelemmy.club 1 points 11 months ago

It was intentionally bad. It was party over country, as usual for the Tories. And then he did a runner when he lost. Filthy piece of toerag, he's got a nerve showing his face in government again.

[-] Nighed@sffa.community 1 points 11 months ago

I'm not sure that calling a referendum to let the voters choose can be considered bad. (The result was though)

this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2023
166 points (100.0% liked)

UK Politics

3064 readers
147 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS