36
rule (lemmy.ml)
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by nebula42@lemmy.ml to c/moretankie196@lemmygrad.ml

*I support it if it can happen without corruption

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Rasm635u@lemmygrad.ml 26 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

No investigation, no right to speak.

Unless you have investigated a problem, you will be deprived of the right to speak on it. Isn't that too harsh? Not in the least. When you have not probed into a problem, into the present facts and its past history, and know nothing of its essentials, whatever you say about it will undoubtedly be nonsense. Talking nonsense solves no problems, as everyone knows, so why is it unjust to deprive you of the right to speak? Quite a few comrades always keep their eyes shut and talk nonsense, and for a Communist that is disgraceful. How can a Communist keep their eyes shut and talk nonsense?

It won' t do!

It won't do!

You must investigate!

You must not talk nonsense!

Edit: changed the pronoun "his" to "their"

this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2023
36 points (100.0% liked)

Be sure to read the rule before you leave

12 readers
1 users here now

Rule 3: If you visit MoreTankie196, you are contractually obliged to post before you leave

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS