311
balances rule (i.imgur.com)
submitted 1 year ago by poplargrove@lemmy.world to c/196
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I prefer rules-based utilitarianism, which is the idea that we should create a system of rules that achieves the most good when followed. If we created a system whereby we rounded up healthy people and forcibly harvested their organs "for the greater good", well, society would collapse as everyone flees to the woods to preserve their own life and organs. No farmers, no scientists, no doctors, no infrastructure maintenance, just global famine. And that would be a far worse net outcome than the current system that lets some people die prematurely due to lack of available organs.

[-] spacesweedkid27@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

A similar thought is Kant's "Kategorischer Imperativ" (I don't know how it's called in English).

I'd say for individual based morality, I'd go with the golden rule.

this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2023
311 points (100.0% liked)

196

16748 readers
2005 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS