15
submitted 2 years ago by SamC@lemmy.nz to c/support@lemmy.nz

It's a pact to block Meta (as in Facebook) run instances if they appear. Obviously up to @Dave to sign, but wondering what people think

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Manticore@lemmy.nz 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I think it's probably a good idea.

Did you know the Neanderthals were arguably more cultured, social, and collaborative than our Human ancestors? Yes the Neanderthals aren't our direct ancestors; they were another competing hominid. Humans killed them - but they also outbred them, including by breeding with them.

Humans are social creatures; the largest federated instances grow far faster than the smaller ones. Not just in absolute number, but in percentages. And Capitalism doesn't want competition in a free market; it wants a monopoly as quickly as possible. Any time a platform represents a threat to Meta's user-share, it buys it (Instagram, WhatsApp), and if it can't, it copies it (TikTok > Reels).

If a known name of a private umbrella like Meta/Facebook, Alphabet/Google, or Microsoft enters the fediverse, the following is likely to happen:

  1. The fediverse gains notoriety, desirability and attention as private platforms enshittify.
  2. It grows until this represents a threat to private platforms losing users to the fediverse.
  3. [Meta]'s private users enter the fediverse via [Meta]'s instances; they're sponsored, accessible, visible or incentivised; they appear to have the lowest barrier for entry; they may integrate with the platforms they're still using.
  4. New users in the fediverse in general likely join [Meta]'s instances; they're large, and where their families and friends are; they promise to be stable and have legal oversight; less likely to blackout from server error or admin corruption.
  5. [Meta] slowly collects the majority of users in the fediverse.
  6. [Meta] reaches a point of having >80% of the fediverse users anyway, and ceases the funding and technical support for federation and gateways, defederating and becoming a high-walled garden.
  7. Other fediverse members are pressured by their colleagues, family/friends etc to make a [Meta] account so they can maintain contact. They won't leave [Meta] because they'd lose contact with anybody staying.
  8. Other fediverse instances are forgotten as their users are pressured back onto private platforms.
  9. [Meta] has successfully gained an effective monopoly over the fediverse.
  10. [Meta]'s fediverse enshittifies.

TLDR: I think the Fedipact (or something like it) is necessary for the fediverse to ever become what we hope it one day can be. To allow self-interested private entities to stack territory in it will eventually see it consumed.

this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2023
15 points (100.0% liked)

Lemmy.nz Support / Meta

368 readers
1 users here now

You can ask questions about the Lemmy.nz instance here.

This community also serves as our Meta community, with posts about updates to the Lemmy software on Lemmy.nz or other things relevant to Lemmy.nz users and not relevant to other instances.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS