998
YouTube's ‘War’ on Adblockers Shows How Google Controls the Internet
(www.404media.co)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2023
998 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
73370 readers
4400 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
The entitlement is crazy on lemmy.
Google doesn’t owe you anything, video hosting is extremely expensive. There’s a reason no competitor exists.
How dare they charge to deliver you a service?
I get what you mean, but I just don't care. I'll stop using YouTube if I can't use it with adblockers.
THANK YOU, finally, I was wondering when someone was going to stick up for the billionaire tech giants. do these stupid fucking lemmings realize that yachts don't pay for themselves??
Here's a solution: make people pay for having their videos hosted. Video hosting is expensive because YT has to host petabytes of shit, useless content. And I don't mean 150 versions of 'I will survive' on ukulele. I mean completely useless videos like this: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/4bLDaQAle6c
Why is YT spending money on hosting this? It should be simple: you want your content hosted? Hosting individual videos would not be that expensive. You want to share couple of videos with friends? Pay $1 per month. Serious creators (with a lot of content) could still get money from ads placed in their videos but THEY should be getting the revenue, not YT. YT would get % of it back in form of the hosting fee. I would simply be a way better model.
How is sharing the love for your puppers useless? A sweet and touching moment.
YT is spending money on hosting that to reinforce their monopoly. If they have the vast majority of user created videos they are able to block ad blockers with minimal loss of user activities. If they did not host such "useless" content another platform would have a space to get a foothold.
Same reason YouTube started hosting shorts, to fill the space that was started on other platforms and help maintain their video hosting monopoly.
Users voicing their displeasure with forced ads is valuable feedback for the monopoly.
Sharing with whom? No one will watch it. Definitely no one will search for it. If you want to share video with your friends just send them a message. They will see it and it will be deleted after a week. This makes way more sense than hosting it on a platform indefinitely.
Well, this way I got to see it. Thanks to you. Thanks.
Luckily for me YT hosts all the crap
Edit: Billions of years ago stars exploded. So today while waiting in line at the DMV I got to have an "awww" moment when someone I don't know posted a link, to a video of other people I don't know enjoying their dog, as an example of useless crap that a computer company hosts on its servers. Stars exploded. And here we are.
Life is wild, man
Here is an alternative Piped link(s):
https://www.piped.video/shorts/4bLDaQAle6c
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.
Wait you mean youtube isn't completely free to run?!?
Year over year I'm pretty sure the cost has only gone down.
TBF 4k and higher resolutions are more common but it's generally not nearly as expensive as it once was.
The cost for 1TB has gone down, the total cost is going up because of the crazy amounts of uploaded content. Youtube is getting more and more expensive.
Storage cost has gone down. Bandwidth costs are way up.
The reason there is no competitor is that YT was intentionally run at a loss for years to quench all other video hosting platforms and establish a monopoly.
Alternatives do exist but they are irrelevant because the vast majority of content is now being uploaded to the biggest platform. Which is precisely in accordance to YT's plan.