896
submitted 2 years ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/world@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] HikingVet@lemmy.sdf.org 116 points 2 years ago

40% of Australia has their head on.

[-] Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works 35 points 2 years ago

While I agree, this survey is based on less than 1% of the population. The article does not clearly cite its sources. 'Based on 1019 responses' from who? Sydneysiders? People from the NT?

This uncited survey from a for profit company, with major shareholders being venture capitalists, asset managers, shitbags, etc. with a history of possible poll manipulation means nothing.

I expect better from the Guardian

[-] ZeroCool@feddit.ch 79 points 2 years ago

this survey is based on less than 1% of the population.

Yes, that's how polls work.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

And surprise surprise they have the predictive value of about chance.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 17 points 2 years ago

You really need to look into the concept of statistical sampling. It's how just about all science works, and I can assure you science works.

[-] jasondj@ttrpg.network 7 points 2 years ago

While I don’t disagree, polling is the absolute worst example of scientific analysis. There are so many easy ways they can be swayed…leading questions, framing questions, selection bias, etc. And that gets used to form manipulative articles based on intentionally misreresentative facts.

Polls really need to be taken with context and a grain of salt.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 5 points 2 years ago

Those are valid critiques.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

And you really shouldn't be having this conversation with a former testing engineer.

You can't compare these garbage polls with what goes on in the science+engineering landscape. The main difference is if we are wrong there are consequences for being wrong.

[-] Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago

OK, so something with no citations or methodology is gospel, got it...

[-] ZeroCool@feddit.ch 38 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

OK, so something with no citations or methodology is gospel, got it…

I didn't say that, now did I? I simply pointed out that criticizing a survey for being based on "less than 1% of the population" is fucking stupid because that's just how polling works. Got it? Good. We're done here.

[-] MelodiousFunk@kbin.social 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The article does not clearly cite its sources. ‘Based on 1019 responses’ from who? Sydneysiders? People from the NT?

This uncited survey from a for profit company, with major shareholders being venture capitalists, asset managers, shitbags, etc. with a history of possible poll manipulation means nothing.

Was that edited in after the fact? Why are people dogpiling based on that first sentence and ignoring the rest?

[-] Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

No it was not edited after.

[-] Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago

My point of contention was not just less than 1%, it was no citations as well. You just used that part.

If I ask 1000 ac/dc fans what the best music genre is they probably are not going to say soft rock.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

The irony of course is that the gospels were made up completely. Except for the part in Luke and John where they admit to coping from other writers.

[-] enki@lemm.ee 16 points 2 years ago

I agree with what you're saying for the most part, but for a population the size of Australia with 1000 respondents, a 99% confidence level has a margin of error of 4% which is perfectly acceptable. Unless the survey targeted very specific demographics versus a random sample, it should be very accurate.

[-] Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 years ago

That was my point though, we have no idea who was surveyed.

[-] AncientFutureNow@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Agreed. YouGov is garbage. They are owned by christian nationalists of the Tory variety. There is nothing governmental about them, and they meddle in public opinion of foreign countries. Their polls rarely show the source information. I've seen them post absurd things, like quietly polling a catholic church and being like, "98% of Americans oppose abortion". I don't know who exactly they polled, cause they won't tell us most of the time.

[-] sndmn@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago

How high are you right meow?

this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2023
896 points (100.0% liked)

World News

48824 readers
1820 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS