1830
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] EatYouWell@lemmy.world 166 points 1 year ago
[-] Oha@lemmy.ohaa.xyz 24 points 1 year ago

I fucking love my 100gb flac collection

[-] EatYouWell@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Do you know a reliable tracker? I have lidarr set up to find lossless versions, but it's pretty terrible at it.

[-] Oha@lemmy.ohaa.xyz 13 points 1 year ago

Im using Soulseek

[-] thisisawayoflife@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Orpheus for torrents, Usenet gets like 90% of the stuff out there though. And don't forget to sort your favorites bands but buying their albums when they provide them as FLAC.

[-] EatYouWell@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Nah, I won't pay for music, unless it's a signed record, because the bands get pretty much no money from the sale, so it's more of a fuck you to the labels. But I will travel to go to concerts and buy merch to support them.

I guess I should get around to figuring out how to use usenet, though.

[-] thisisawayoflife@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I'm pretty sure they are getting money at their merch tables, but I could be wrong.

[-] stewie3128@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

This was more true when the labels were running everything. Now you can get a lot of the material more-or-less directly from the artists on various platforms. Instead of artists getting 5% of the $$$, they can get 70%+.

Just saying that not everything you listen to is necessarily by a band signed to a label. A lot of newer talents have gotten wise to the scam the labels have been running (for the same reasons you articulated - who would knowingly sign up for that?) and are putting things out themselves instead.

[-] EatYouWell@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Ah, that makes sense, but I only listen to the same artists I have been for 20 years (or artists that I've discovered that have been active for that long), so not much has changed with the labels for me specifically.

[-] dditty@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Usenet is way better than torrenting. I had heard about it for years and finally checked it out a month ago. I bought a few lifetime memberships to trackers (but just nzbgeek might be enough) and subscribed to news hosting. The reliability and speeds are so much better. Plus the traffic is encrypted and it's much less common than torrenting so also safer

[-] uglyfurniture@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Can you recomend me some trackers? I've been considering usenet for a few months now but never pulled the trigger

[-] dditty@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm using nzbgeek, nzbplanet, and miatrix

[-] uglyfurniture@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I'll check these out, thanks!

[-] pudcollar@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I made a XSPF format list of lossy versions, imported into qobuz and deezer using soundiiz, and downloaded from there using qobuz-dl and deemix, fwiw. Got about 1.2 TB this way

[-] Exusia@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Where does one begin to find flac? I am taking the first steps beyond "finding a movie to play for free"

[-] Oha@lemmy.ohaa.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

Tidal + Tidal-dl or Soulseek

[-] atx_aquarian@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

hdtracks.com and Bandcamp are some sources.

[-] systemglitch@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

I use FLAC for albums I love and mp3s for everything else (including copies of the flacs in mp3). It's a nice balance.

Fucking love my collection of music. I use Spotify as well, but nothing can compete with literally owning a music collection of my own I can listen to without the Internet

[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago

This is the way. Also, FLAC for high bit rate audiophile vinyl rips.

[-] systemglitch@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

I literally got goosebumps reading that. Take my Iron Maiden collection for example:

I have mp3 versions of all albums. Different release versions of FLACs and then a vinyl FLAC collection as well.

It's nice exploring the difference in sound, but somehow, vinyl always makes me feel the best.

Man I miss what.cd.

[-] supert@lemmy.sdfeu.org 2 points 1 year ago
[-] systemglitch@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I did and failed. I don't want to waste that many hours of my life trying again. So they lose out on an amazing seeder and I lose out on good access to music.

[-] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

Gotta use that lossless format so you can pick up all the sound artefacts caused by an imperfect physical format.

[-] XyliaSky@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

Despite vinyl’s technical inferiority, it was those same limitations that meant vinyl actually sounded better than CD throughout a specific period. Vinyl cannot be too loud or the needle will jump off the track, making the vinyl unplayable. This prevented vinyl from dealing with the loudness wars, and brick wall dynamic range compression. So especially for the early 2000s, the masters used for the vinyl mix were often significantly better.

And, a clean record played on clean and properly set up equipment can sound really pristine, especially if copied to a digital format early in its life. You wouldn’t even be able to tell it’s vinyl.

[-] Repelle@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

+1 to all you said. I collect vinyl for a number of reasons and none of them are because it is technically superior (it isn’t) however, many (most?) people have never heard just how good vinyl can actually sound when it’s in good condition and played on a good setup. I personally cannot tell the difference between even a 33 and CD, let alone a 45, and I have a decently high end setup.

My ears like to trick me and tell me I can hear a difference between a 33 and 45 but I’m pretty sure this is a lie.

[-] XyliaSky@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Not to mention, psychoacoustics don’t really give a damn about fidelity, so if your goal is “I want it to sound good to me” moreso than “I want it to reproduce sounds accurately” then there’s arguments for vinyl, tube amplifiers, vintage speakers, etc.

Hell I have a friend who specifically uses one of the earliest CD players because it had a 14 bit DAC and no oversampling vs 16 bit DAC, and for those few albums he really likes the digital distortion that comes with it because that’s how he first heard it.

[-] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Compared to CD? If you have to compare it to a lossy compressed format to make it look good in comparison, then maybe it's not that good overall. You may have noticed it's no longer the early 2000s and CDs are not ubiquitous, nor even very common at all anymore.

[-] XyliaSky@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Lossy compressed format? Where? Are you talking about CD? The format famous for using uncompressed PCM audio perfectly specified to cover 100% of a human’s hearing range?

Because if that’s what you mean, you’ve got some studying to go do.

[-] GrammatonCleric@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

BUY ME BIGGER STORAGE BROTHER

[-] EatYouWell@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago
[-] GrammatonCleric@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

That's a lot of hip-hop 😂

[-] clif@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Are you using an off the shelf NAS or a DIY? I'm looking for around that much space but the consumer/prosumer grade stuff I've seen doesn't really do what I want (full disk encryption, Linux, ability to customize and host a few applications).

I originally figured I'd just cram 5x12TB drives in a case, RAID5, with my Linux flavor of choice... Then I learned how bad RAID5 is with big disks.

I don't need mirroring or high throughput (home NAS - other device backups and local streaming) but would preferably like a little redundancy... As a treat.

Got any pointers?

[-] EatYouWell@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I'm using a Synology, and I love it. I have most of my self hosted servers running on it in docker containers, and I can use the Surveillance Station to locally store and view my camera setup.

I'll probably buy actual server hardware at some point, but I need to do my network build out first.

[-] dutchkimble@lemy.lol 1 points 1 year ago

What do you think of the Asustor flashtor NAS drives which have 6-12 m2 slots...I think you can run any OS on it if their own software doesn't check all the boxes for you

https://www.jeffgeerling.com/blog/2023/how-i-installed-truenas-on-my-new-asustor-nas

[-] brygphilomena@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Truenas or unraid

[-] dezmd@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Listen up, all you young whippersnappers and your FLAC collections, we downloaded our lossy but 'high enough quality' 128kbps mp3s from those IRC DCC Fserves back in the 90s using our dialup internet and we didnt complain!

Unless of course someone picked up the house phone and caused our internet to disconnect.

[-] EatYouWell@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Don't forget Limewire and Kazaa

[-] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

I'm still shuffling some of those.

[-] CentreForAnts@aussie.zone 4 points 1 year ago

It's all about the 64kbps .wma's. I could fit so many songs on my 128mb mp3 player back in the day

this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2023
1830 points (100.0% liked)

memes

10696 readers
2573 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS