196
Hamilton and Leclerc disqualified from USGP
(www.racefans.net)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2023
196 points (100.0% liked)
Formula 1
10460 readers
45 users here now
Welcome to Formula1 @ lemmy.world Lemmy's largest community for Formula 1 and related racing series
📆 F1 Calendar
🏁 FIA Documents
📊 F1 Pace
2025 Calendar
| Location | Date |
|---|---|
| 🇲🇽 Mexico | 24-26 Oct |
| 🇧🇷 Brazil | 07-09 Nov |
| 🇺🇸 United States | 20-22 Nov |
| 🇶🇦 Qatar | 28-30 Nov |
| 🇦🇪 Abu Dhabi | 05-07 Dec |
Rules
- Be respectful to everyone: drivers, lemmings etc
- No gambling, crypto or NFTs
- Spoilers are allowed
- Non English articles should include a translation in the comments by deepl.com or similar
- Paywalled articles should include at least a brief summary in the comments, the wording of the article should not be altered
- Social media posts should be posted as screenshots with a link for those who want to view it
- Memes are allowed on Monday only as we all do like a laugh or 2, but don’t want to become formuladank.
- No duplicate posts, or posts of different news companies that say the same thing.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
On a sprint weekend, the planks undergo 19 more laps of wear than at a typical event. In this case that’s almost 65 more miles of racing on the same plank. Holding the ”randomly selected cars” to the same floor allowance as if it was a standard race weekend but then NOT checking all the teams when you have a 50% failure rate is just plain wrong. Either have a different allowance on the sprint weekend, check ALL the cars or don’t check at all.
Just a nitpick: it's not always 19 more laps. It's the fewest amount of laps that puts the sprint race over 100km (about 62 miles). At COTA, that's 19 laps. Next time at Interlagos, it's 24.
Does it really work this way? I saw an engineer on Twitter say that they must've been far over the limit for the plank to wear so much.