438
fuzzy memory rule
(d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2023
438 points (100.0% liked)
196
17261 readers
1699 users here now
Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.
Rule: You must post before you leave.
Other rules
Behavior rules:
- No bigotry (transphobia, racism, etc…)
- No genocide denial
- No support for authoritarian behaviour (incl. Tankies)
- No namecalling
- Accounts from lemmygrad.ml, threads.net, or hexbear.net are held to higher standards
- Other things seen as cleary bad
Posting rules:
- No AI generated content (DALL-E etc…)
- No advertisements
- No gore / violence
- Mutual aid posts require verification from the mods first
NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.
Other 196's:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Anarchism. The circle-A drawn like that (without the lines extending beyond the circle) is how it's traditionally drawn.
...different people with different opinions?
You do know lemmy isn't one person yeah?
Inside you are two wolves. One is communist, the other an anarchist.
Anarchism and communism are 95% the same in regards to goals. They just have different views on how to get there, that differ very little or a lot depending on the specific sub ideology, of which there are many. The 5% with different goals are some anarchist tendencies which want to keep markets and money, like mutualism. Everyone else wants a stateless, moneyless and classless society where people contribute according to their ability and receive according to their need on the basis of mutual aid. And no, "anarcho"-capitalism is not a thing, that's an oxymoron.
Personally I'd be a ok with just some wealth redistribution, but everyday without that I am getting more radicalized.
Wealth redistribution is only resetting the board, not a change in the game.
That's literally the game.
god dammit.
Same.
Sounds like you should learn more about the history of the two concepts then, because they've never been mutually exclusive.
I guess their different mental images of the final step of an ideal economic system under their chosen system has a lot of overlap.